Former Libyan Leader Gaddafi breaks it down in a video below ...
Mark Danof photo was [found here with post].
It is amazing how much is censored on the internet, just appearing, and then disappearing minutes later.
The JFK Assassination is beaten to death with so many conspiracy theories, I almost was not going to listen or consider any more.
Could the JFK Assassination have anything to do with Israel not wanting to answer questions about the Dimona Nuclear Plant? Did a Secret Service Agent use an M-16 with the prodding of the CIA, or Mossad, to shoot Kennedy in the car behind in the presence of a carload of other Secret Service Agents?
I have seen what lying scumbags local and state cops can be with my own ears. I have seen what they are capable of with my own eyes. Their versions higher up on the food chain are no different. The Domestic Spying will be the downfall of he US and any "free" country anywhere in the world. I won't harp on it beyond this paragraph, but spying police told me that I was not allowed to vote, own a home, be married, have my daughter in my life, have my contracting business, to date after police caused my divorce, that I was not allowed to share my opinions, talk to reporters or elected officials, and then was told I was kicked out of the State of Connecticut, [that story]. Police told me that I work for them, they are the bosses, and I have to listen to what I am told, "or else ..."
What is plausible? What is more than possible? Who benefits?
Libya's Gaddafi Compares America to Hitler's Germany/Claims JFK killed by Mossad (6/11/08)
So ... my mind is open to how deep the rabbit hole actually goes ...
I happened to catch another version of the below video on LiveLeak.com and surprised at what is still up on [my channel on that site
The below video is amazing for what is its content. I can't vouch for the accuracy of the translation.
Did the Secret Service and CIA Execute JFK with an M-16?
The most believable JFK Assassination "Conspiracy Theory" yet?
An AR-15 or M-16 would have been a state of the art assault rifle in the early 1960's. US Troops were still carrying M-14s which are 30 caliber. The M-16 shoot bullets that are amazingly fast, capable of making a head, or watermelon explode from the force.
Simple ballistics isn't sexy. Oliver Stone's film has lots of drama. Boring facts don't make a good movie.
The Secret Service had the most convenient kill shot.
A Secret Service Agent carrying an AR-15 right behind the John F. Kennedy presidential limousine and allegedly discharging it into JFK's head was likely no accident. The Secret Service immediately tampered with, destroyed, falsified, and stole evidence. They immediately intimidated witnesses and obstructed justice. That is historical fact.
I caught the whole documentary on Netflix with zero expectations. I was pleasantly surprised and left with a new understanding of what is most probable.
Text with video:
Published on Dec 5, 2013
Australian investigator Colin
McLaren created a 90-minute documentary and book based on and
supporting Donahue's theory, both titled JFK: The Smoking Gun. The
documentary aired on Australian and American television on November 3,
2013. The documentary features re-enactments, archival
footage, and new interviews with Menninger, with Donahue's daughter, and
with witnesses to the shooting. A one-hour abridged version of this
documentary aired in the UK on November 13, 2013, entitled JFK's Secret
Killer: The Evidence.
McLaren reconstructs Donahue's ballistics
tests as described in Mortal Error, placing the second gunman exactly
where Agent Hickey was positioned.
To back up the accidental shot
theory, the documentary showed a photograph of Agent Hickey holding up
an AR-15 while standing inside a Secret Service follow-up car as it
speeds behind the Presidential limousine with Secret Service Agent Clint
Hill on its rear. Finding this photograph was crucial to Donahue's
decision to publish his work and was used on the front cover of
The documentary demonstrated the possibility of
there being two different bullet calibres involved, and therefore two
weapons, by stating bullet fragments found inside Kennedy's skull, from
the catastrophic head shot, proved it disintegrated on impact, which lay
contrary to the ballistics evidence of Oswald's second shot, a bullet
which travelled straight through the President and into Governor
Connally. Using Donahue's original research, McLaren demonstrated, with a
drill and artificial skull, how the entry wound of the third and final
shot was too small to allow a 6.5mm bullet from a Mannlicher-Carcano
rifle, but was a perfect fit for a 5.56mm bullet from an AR-15.
evidence put forward by the documentary stated how an agitated Secret
Service chief James Rowley admitted, at the Warren Commission, that
AR-15s were no longer used by his organisation inside protection
vehicles since the assassination; and also that classified Secret
Service documents on the assassination were destroyed just one week
prior to being handed over to the Assassination Records Review Board in
Though it highlighted eyewitness testimony concerning the
origin of the gunshots (some saying the Texas School Book Depository,
some saying the Grassy Knoll, some saying both), the documentary did not
make mention of any eyewitnesses who saw a gunshot coming from the
Presidential motorcade. Reference was, however, made to several
bystanders in Dealey Plaza who did recall the smell of gunpowder
immediately after the shooting, with the documentary noting the
direction of a breeze that day made it possible the gunpowder had
originated from the vicinity of the motorcade.
Donahue died in
1999. In the documentary, his daughter Colleen says he was
always surprised that his work received so little attention. At the time
of his death he was working on another book on the same topic.
Excerpt from Mark Dankof below was originally [found here]:
news media, for all the usual and most obvious reasons, has systematically
ignored the most explosive news story in years, made all the more relevant by
the countdown to further conflict in the Middle East as credible rumors continue
to surface that Israel and the United States are planning an act of preemptive
war against Iran in coming months.
The story, which
appeared in the Express Newspapers of India
on Monday, July 26th, quotes Israeli nuclear whistleblower
Mordecai Vanunu as crediting the Israeli Mossad
with the assassination of President Kennedy. Even more incredibly, Vanunu
states specifically that the motive for the assassination of Kennedy on the part
of the Israeli government was related to the American President’s insistence
that the Zionist State come clean about its nuclear program at the infamous
Dimona plant in the Negev desert.
released by the Israeli authorities in April after 18 years imprisonment for a
treason conviction related to the disclosure of state secrets regarding the
Israelis’ nuclear program. His sensational public charge about the involvement
of the Mossad in the Kennedy murder might simply be relegated to the realm of
the utterances of a disgruntled or imbalanced man, except for one additional
Michael Collins Piper, the author of
Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK
Assassination Conspiracy, has made a previous case for Israel’s
direct involvement in the Dealey Plaza murder of John Kennedy on November 22,
1963 that is both plausible and compelling. The Vanunu account simply
underscores and corroborates the case Piper made originally over a decade ago.
The converging accounts of the two men are most disturbing.
Piper tells the
reader of Final Judgment that
1963 proved to be a pivotal year in a publicly
unreported conflict between America’s 35th President and Israeli
Prime Minister David Ben Gurion, principally over Israel’s failure to submit its
Dimona operation to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspection,
and secondarily to a negotiated settlement with the Palestinians. He
subsequently proceeds to discuss the principle alleged players in the
assassination plot itself in a way which corroborates the research of such
respected Kennedy assassination scholars as the UK’s
Anthony Summers and University of Texas
professor Jim Marrs. Readers of the work
of Summers and Marrs will be intimately familiar with names like Sam Giancana,
Johnny Roselli, Carlos Marcello, Guy Banister, William Harvey, William Sullivan,
George de Mohrenschildt, James Jesus Angleton, Richard Helms, Alpha 66, and
Santos Trafficante. Typically, the demonstrated links of these individuals with
organized crime syndicates, the anti-Castro Cuban exilic community of the early
1960s, and an element of the Central Intelligence Agency involved with the first
two groups, has resulted in past tentative conclusions that the crux of the plot
that took Mr. Kennedy’s life involved a convergence of interest of these three
(3) key constituencies involved in a sordid triumvirate deliberately concealed
from the American public 40 years ago by the Warren Commission.
Piper does not
discredit this conclusion reached by his predecessors in their research of the
circumstances that led specific individuals to participate in a plot to kill the
President. He simply demonstrates what has been hidden from view before now:
that those fingered by the meticulous academic
research of Summers, Marrs, and others, have even deeper demonstrable
associations with the Israeli lobby and Israeli intelligence.
Final Judgment’s case in this regard
is principally built on the key significance of
Meyer Lansky as the real power player in American organized crime in the
1950s and 1960s, the superior of Giancana, Roselli, Marcello, Mickey Cohen,
Mickey Weiner, Moe Dalitz, Frank Costello, and others previously mentioned as
participants in the Kennedy conspiracy. In turn,
Lansky’s role as a committed Zionist and fund-raiser for the State of Israel
involved direct, palpable links between his criminal empire, his
Miami-based banks, and the Banque de Credit
International (BCI) in Geneva, Switzerland. This latter entity served as
the European-based money laundering center for Mr. Lansky’s global activities.
BCI in turn, was headed up by an Israeli
banker, Tibor Rosenbaum, former Director for
Finances and Supply for the Israeli Mossad. Piper then demonstrates that
BCI was a chief share holder in a
Rome-based corporation called
CMC/Permindex, whose chairman of the
board was none other than Louis M. Bloomfield of
Montreal, Canada, a major fund-raiser for Israel and known asset for
Israeli intelligence. CMC/Permindex, in
turn, proves to be a major point of intersection which brings the shadowy
Bloomfield into direct or indirect contact with
Clay Shaw (the chief target of the Jim Garrison JFK investigation in New
Orleans), Guy Banister,
James Jesus Angleton, FBI Division 5
chief William Sullivan (who spearheaded
the FBI investigation for the Warren Commission and served as FBI liaison and
friend of Angleton), ex-Cuban President Carlos
Prio Socarras (provable gun-running business partner of Oswald assassin
Ernest Israel Japhet (chairman and
president of Israeli Bank Leumi),
Shaul Eisenberg (a key figure in Israel’s
nuclear bomb development and participant with Rosenbaum in the
Swiss-Israel Trade Bank),
elements of the French nationalist Secret Army
Organization (OAS), CIA agent Theodore Shackley (the
CIA’s chief of station in Miami during the
CIA-Lansky assassination plots against Fidel Castro), and
Abe Feinberg, New York Jewish businessman
used by Ben Gurion as the liaison for secret
meetings with President Kennedy to resolve the dispute of the latter two
over Dimona. It is thus the BCI and CMC/Permindex players and links which Piper
employs to show that the players, alliances, and assets were firmly in place to
bring those with motive, means, and opportunity together in a plot which
culminated in Dallas.
Piper buttresses his case by showing the results for Israel subsequent to the
tragedy in Dallas in November of 1963. The removal of Kennedy brought an end to
American demands for IAEA inspections of the Israeli nuclear program, and the
ascension to the White House of Lyndon Johnson,
whose long ties to Meyer Lansky and Carlos Marcello had assisted the
barefoot boy of the Texas Hill Country in his arrival at 1600 Pennsylvania
Avenue. More significantly, Johnson’s arrival in the Oval Office represented a
sea change in American Middle Eastern policy, establishing for Piper the
Israel-First direction of every American Chief Executive from LBJ onward, to the
detriment of the independence of the American government from the undue
influence of the Israeli lobby, the maintenance of regional peace and stability
in the most dangerous area of the globe, and any vestiges of hope for positive
American political relationships with the Islamic world.
The Vanunu-Piper allegations about Israel will
not go away. The revelations of direct Israeli connections to key members
of the Neo-Conservative foreign policy team of George W. Bush most desirous of
conflict with Iraq; the virtual ownership of the United States Congress by the
American-Israeli Political Action Committee (AIPAC); and the sycophancy of John
Kerry toward these same interests, will culminate in a political boiling point
in the United States if an expanded American involvement in a Middle Eastern
war, the re-institution of an American Draft, and further instances of Middle
East-related terrorism in the American homeland end up being connected by the
public to the interests of Israel and Zionism and not those of the United
States. Further exposure and corroboration of the Vanunu-Piper charges that the
Israeli government was the driving force behind the death of John F. Kennedy--in
conjunction with further exposure of Tel Aviv’s ongoing manipulation of the
American government and media in issues of War and Empire–will commence a mass
revolt against the policy elites that neither Tel Aviv nor Washington will be
able to contain or control.
Between now and
the first Tuesday in November, the policy elites will do their best to conceal
fair disclosure and debate over who controls the present process and benefits by
it. Suppression of information will be their modus operandi. Bush, Kerry,
and their respective pals in Corporate America and Big Media will do their best
to obfuscate the truth, ignore the discussion of the core issues of War and
Peace, and hide the real identity of their financiers and handlers through such
information suppression. Suppressing any serious examination or dissemination of
the Vanunu-Piper case against Israel is already a done deal. It is a real shame.
Pity us, the “free” American Republic, that no one will ask our two Presidential
aspirants some pressing questions in the days ahead, including what they think
of the following Presidential document from 41 years ago.
July 5, 1963
Prime Minister (Levi Eshkol of Israel):
It gives me
great personal pleasure to extend congratulations as you assume your
responsibilities as Prime Minister of Israel. You have our friendship and best
wishes in your new tasks. It is on one of these that I am writing you at this
aware, I am sure, of the exchange which I had with Prime Minister Ben-Gurion
concerning American visits [i.e.: inspections] to Israel’s nuclear facility at
Dimona. Most recently, the Prime Minister wrote to me on May 27th.
His words reflected a most intense personal consideration of a problem that I
know is not easy for your Government, as it is not for mine. We welcomed the
former Prime Minister’s strong reaffirmation that Dimona will be devoted
exclusively to peaceful purposes and the reaffirmation also of Israel’s
willingness to permit periodic visits [inspections] to Dimona.
having to add to your burdens so soon after your assumption of office, but I
feel the crucial importance of this problem necessitates my taking up with you
at this early date certain further considerations, arising out of Mr.
Ben-Gurion’s May 27th letter, as to the nature and scheduling of such
I am sure you
will agree that these visits should be nearly as possible in accord with
international standards, thereby resolving all doubts as to the peaceful intent
of the Dimona project. As I wrote Mr. Ben-Gurion, this Government’s commitment
to and support of Israel could be seriously jeopardized if it should be thought
that we were unable to obtain reliable information on a subject as vital to the
peace as the question of Israel’s effort in the nuclear field.
asked our scientists to review the alternative schedules of visits we and you
had proposed. If Israel’s purposes are to be clear beyond reasonable doubt, I
believe that the schedule which would best serve our common purposes would be a
visit early this summer, another visit in June 1964, and thereafter at intervals
of six months. I am sure that such a schedule should not cause you any more
difficulty than that which Mr. Ben-Gurion proposed in his May 27th
letter. It would be essential, and I understand that Mr. Ben-Gurion’s letter was
in accord with this, that our scientists have access to all areas of the Dimona
site and to any related part of the complex, such as fuel fabrication facilities
or plutonium separation plant, and that sufficient time be allotted for a
you fully appreciate the truly vital significance of this matter to the future
well-being of Israel, to the United States, and internationally, I am sure our
carefully considered request will have your most sympathetic attention.