Tuesday, November 09, 2004

Ruling could limit lawyer-media interactions


PHILADELPHIA, Pennsylvania (AP) -- Lawyers who offer to help reporters by sending them copies of court documents by fax or e-mail do so at the peril of losing their immunity to defamation suits, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled.

Under a long-recognized doctrine called "judicial privilege," attorneys who file lawsuits -- even frivolous or malicious ones -- are protected from being sued for slander or libel over the accusations they make in court.

The idea is that lawyers need to be free to litigate vigorously, without fear they will themselves be sued for defamation if their case ultimately is rejected.

But in an October 20 decision, the state Supreme Court said that those protections largely evaporate once an attorney steps outside a courthouse.

The ruling involved attorney Kevin W. Gibson, who faxed a copy of a legal malpractice lawsuit to a reporter for The Legal Intelligencer, a newspaper that covers legal affairs in Philadelphia.

The defendant in the case sued, claiming the allegations in the suit were false, and that Gibson opened himself up to a libel claim by providing a copy of it to a reporter.

A judge initially tossed out the defamation case and ruled that barring attorneys from forwarding copies of lawsuits to the press would have a "chilling effect" on newsgathering.
The Supreme Court voted 4-2 to reinstate the case.

The court suggested in a footnote that reporters who want copies of court complaints may simply pick them up at the courthouse in person, or find a clerk willing to provide them.

The ruling is one of two the court has made recently that could make it harder for journalists to gather and report the news.

In late October, the state Supreme Court decided that Pennsylvania's constitution does not recognize a press protection called the "neutral reportage privilege."

In some states, the privilege prevents news organizations from being sued for reporting defamatory comments made by public figures as long as the media do it in a fair and balanced way. The above was found on CNN (here)

* * * *

Lawyers do need to be put on a leash and DO need oversight.

What would you think of a lawyer that charged over $17,000 and didn't lift a finger to defend his client against having been beaten on his own property during a robbery attempt, and was arrested and put in prison for using pepper spray against the criminal in self-defense? (post)

Steal Billions, kill your ex-wife leave your DNA and glove, shoot your neighbor cut his body up, rape little boys at your Neverland Ranch …


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

View My Stats