18:28 2003-03-14
All heroine that is available in Europe is of Afghan origin,
Vikingas on 09/21 at 04:36 PM
-->
http://users.resist.ca/~mayworks/911/2/newwar.shtml
excerpt.
Building on this, the “war on terrorism” has provided increased legitimacy for the military to be a strong presence throughout the US. Defense Secretary Rumsfield has openly called for a greater role for the US military so that it can be used to fight “terrorism” in the US itself.
These are powers that have not been considered necessary since the post-Civil War Reconstruction era, when the 1879 Posse Comitatus law effectively outlawed domestic military participation.
Already the US Congress has approved US$40 billion in aid, much of that going to the military machine. In addition, the US House of Representatives has approved a 9% increase in spending for spy agencies that were already consuming US$30 billion per year. US Attorney General John Ashcroft called recently for “increased surveillance and detention ability for agencies such as the FBI.” $300 million was approved for “aid” to Afghanistan. How much of that money will be spent arming the murderous and terrorizing band of thugs called the Northern Alliance in that country?
Posted by on 09/21 at 06:09 PM
#
http://www.surrealist.org/people/msimon1.html
Articles by M. Simon are printed with express permission of the author. To see an index of articles, click here.
Heroin By M. Simon
Heroin. The name itself strikes terror into the heart these days. But originally it was named by the Bayer people from the word heroine. Or female hero. Why? Because it was so effective in relieving pain and suffering. If it were legal it would still be one of the most effective pain relievers in the doctor’s arsenal. It was also considered such a safe and effective medicine that it was available over the counter until 1914.
The story these days with heroin is different. It not only is not available over the counter, its not available anywhere in America legally.
So where does this leave us today? We have black markets and addicts. Black markets of course require police and addicts require treatment.
An interesting study by Dr. Lonny Shavelson looks into the world of the addicts and their treatment. What do we know? What works? How can addicts be helped?
First we start out with an unusual point of view. Most addicts are in pain. This is quite surprising. It surprised me. I thought they were just in it for the euphoria.
Here is what Dr. Shavelson found in his study of 200 addicts: a high proportion of severely abused children (beatings, rapes, rapes of siblings). He questioned his study methodology. He thought there must have been a flaw in how his sample was selected or in how the questions he asked were framed.
Then while he was doing his research, an article came out in the Journal of the American Medical Association that said that the addiction rate goes up for male sexually abused children. And it doesn’t just double or triple. It is 25 to 50 times higher than the rest of the population. Approximately 70% of the women in drug rehab experienced sexual abuse before they started on drugs. In other words, those heroine addicts not in actual physical pain are suffering from severe post traumatic stress disorder, PTSD. What is the preferred treatment in America today for these hurt and humiliated souls? We don’t deal with the pain that made them liable for drug abuse. We ask that before they can be healed that they heal themselves by giving up drugs. And then we wonder why rehab for hard-core addicts does not work too well. But how could it when the treatment does not match the disease.
So the next time the TV expose shows the junkie with the spike in his or her vein think of what torment that person must be in internally in order to put them in the place they are in. And all too often our response to those suffering is to jail them. Barbaric. Or treatment that deals with symptoms and not causes. Stupid.
Dr. Shavelson has written a book called “Hooked” about his experiences with addicts. A recent transcript of an interview by NPR with the doctor is available here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Addiction or Self Medication? By M. Simon
“Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize an undercover dictatorship. To restrict the art of healing to one class of men, and deny equal privilege to others, will be to constitute the Bastille of medical science. All such laws are un-American and despotic, and have no place in a Republic. The Constitution of this Republic should make special privilege for medical freedom as well as religious freedom.” Abridged quote
----Benjamin Rush, M.D., a signer of the Declaration of Independence
Let me start this little essay on the uses of marijuana with an idea. A very simple idea. An idea that strikes at the very heart of the drug war and it’s moralistic foundation. The very idea that those who use unapproved drugs are the lawful subjects of religiously motivated government persecution.
What we call addiction is in fact self treatment of undiagnosed pain.
This is a truly revolutionary idea. If it is in fact true then the whole notion of a drug war to save the children is a lie from beginning to end. Those of you who have read my article on heroin have a window into this new idea. What I tried to show in that article was that medical research shows that victims of sexual abuse and severe physical abuse (PTSD) are many times more likely to get addicted to heroin than the general public.
Let us next look at the case for marijuana.
Natural molecules similar to an active ingredient in marijuana play a part in helping the brain clear fearful memories and keep them from being permanently debilitating. The British journal Nature has reported this discovery by scientists at the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry in Munich, Germany. The scientists of the Institute say that this has implications for the treatment of post traumatic stress disorder and other fear based conditions.
It turns out that anxiety disorders are the most common mental health problem in the United States. They are worth $46 billion a year to the pharmaceutical industry. You don’t suppose this fact has any thing to do with the pharmaceutical industries being in the forefront of the Drug Free America campaign do you? Of course not. They are just trying to keep you from being addicted to natural products at the cost of 1/10th of a cent per dose when they are more than willing to sell you an FDA and doctor approved, pharmacy sold product that will do the job for a dollar a dose. They have only your best interests at heart. Just ask their accountants.
All humans show fear reactions to dangerous situations. However, in the case of one out of ten people (surprisingly the same percentage of people who are susceptible to substance addiction) the fear does not die down in the absence of the dangerous situation. The fear stays at debilitating levels even in the absence of danger. These people have a definite, if ordinarily invisible problem. You cannot find this problem with x-rays. It is possible that this problem could be found with a many thousand dollar PET scan. Or you could take a few puffs of a joint and see if that helps.
If the joint was legal.
Which it is not.
Pankaj Sah of Australian National University believes that chronic marijuana users are self medicating for anxiety problems. He goes on further to say that we self medicate for head aches with aspirin and this causes no social problems. He speculates that people experiencing emotional problems are taking cannabis for relief. Of course since this medicine is not doctor approved it is against the law. Especially it is against Federal Law, as a number of states have made medical use of marijuana legal. The Feds in California know how to stop this though. They put the sick, the dying and the pain wracked in jail to show their compassion. You don’t suppose it has anything to do with maintaining at all costs the State and Federal $50 billion dollar drug war do you?
Not a chance.
They are the government and they have only your best interests at heart. Trust them.
You can read a good review of the report here.
Let me leave you with a final quote from a Supreme Court Judge:
“Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government’s purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.” Justice Brandeis
That quote and an impassioned speech for the right of self medication can be found here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Police and PTSD By M. Simon
All too many police officers are victims of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. PTSD. This disorder is a response to traumatic stress. Seeing victims of violence. Having to kill some one in the line of duty. Being hurt in the line of duty. Seeing the death of a child.
This disorder was first identified as “shell shock” and soldiers were it’s first identified victims. As time has gone on and further work has been done in the field; we have learned more. In the aftermath of the Viet Nam War we learned more about “shell shock” and stated calling it PTSD. With more research we found that soldiers were not it’s only victims. We found out that police and firemen also “got” PTSD. Then we found that victims of severe child abuse and childhood sexual assault also got PTSD.
Now we know even more. The drunken cop who abuses his wife is a regular stereotype. Drinking alcohol to numb the pain and taking your pain out on those close to you are two recognized symptoms of PTSD. Alcoholism may not be a “disease” but a response to pain.
In fact we now know even more. Police in some jurisdictions are being trained to look for signs of PTSD in the populace they police in order to better help keep the peace. Some markers that stand out in children are abuse of legal and illegal drugs. Cocaine. Alcohol. Heroin. Pot.
The Western New York Rural Mental Health Partnership advises police that “ ‘self medication’ with alcohol or illegal drugs is a common complication found in adolescents with mental health problems.”
The Massachusetts Department of Mental Health says “Youths who suffer from PTSD frequently use alcohol or other drugs to ‘self-medicate’ in an attempt to dull painful memories or psychological torment.”
Police in the above mentioned jurisdictions are given booklets with the above guidelines in them. The only thing left out of the guides is that what afflicts children can also afflict adults. In fact not even the police are immune.
Just as we should have compassion for children with PTSD problems so we should also have compassion for the police and all other adults whose pain is still all too real. Running a steam roller over those already hit by a truck does not live up to the American ideal of justice or compassion.
An online health guide to PTSD advises:
“It is important to be gentle on yourself and to give yourself time to heal.”
Just as it is true of the individual so it also ought to be true of society in general. Once we see that what we have been doing for so long is inappropriate we will need to change our behavior at once. After changing our ways we are also going to need time to heal. Because hurting those who didn’t deserve it is a stressor. And stress can lead to PTSD.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Pain Enforcement Administration By M. L. Simon
America’s Puritan heritage is described by H.L. Mencken as a person who is constantly worried that somewhere, sometime, someone might be having a good time. This is the fundamental nature of our government morality bureau: the Drug Enforcement Administration. As a morality bureau it does not enforce the taking of drugs, but merely the kind of drugs that can be taken, by whom, when, and in what amounts.
If you have been following my previous columns you know that people take drugs to relieve pain. They take the kind of drug and amount that allows them to function given their level of pain. This is true of legal and illegal drugs. We know that opiate patients in hospitals have very little problem giving up opiates when their pain is gone. We know that given the chance to self regulate opiate delivery that people take no more than is necessary to relieve their pain. This is as true of illegal drugs as it is of legal drugs. Drugs do not cause drug taking. Pain causes drug taking.
There are no addicts. Only people in pain. What we call addiction is self medication for undiagnosed pain such as PTSD or other severe emotional or physical trauma. Cure the pain and the desire for the drugs vanishes. This is true not only of drug addicts but also alcohol addicts and food addicts as well. In fact it is my belief that it is true of all so called addictions. This is made quite clear by the title of the popular book on food addictions called “It’s Not What You Eat, But What’s Eating You” by Jack Schwartz.
What does all this have to do with the DEA? It is quite simple. The purpose of the DEA is the enforcement of pain. Or as they would prefer the prevention of the use of drugs to help people feel better. They make this quite clear in the recent series of prosecutions of doctors who treat patients with intractable pain. A case in point is Dr. Marlou Davis a pain management specialist in Missouri who was recently arrested for prescribing “excessive” doses of opiods to his patients despite the fact that the original case was dropped in October of 2000. Another case is that of Doctor William E. Hurwitz of Northern Virginia who had his clinic shut down by the DEA for prescribing “excessive” amounts of OxyContin. Dr. Hurwitz writes “While spokesmen for the DEA give lip service to the idea of a balanced enforcement policy that preserves the access of deserving patients to needed medications, these aggressive and ill informed prosecutions convey a message of intimidation to doctors and of indifference to the plight of patients in pain.” You can read the rest of the Doctor’s message to his patients. The Doctor also has given a talk on “The Police State of Medicine”.
America is a Judeo-Christian nation culturally, dedicated to the relief of suffering. We have direct proof of this in recent surveys about the acceptance of medical marijuana. Eighty percent of the American people believe that is OK to use marijuana for the relief of suffering in medical situations, despite the efforts of Federal and State law enforcement bodies to discourage this point of view.
I think it is time to prevail on our law makers to put an end to the Pain Enforcement Administration other wise known as the DEA. It is time to stop making criminals out of people in pain and the doctors who treat them.
Write your Senators and Congress persons and let them know how you feel. The pain you relieve may one day be your own. Try one of these Web Sites for contact information:
U.S. House of Representatives Write Your Representative Service
Senators of the 107th Congress
Contacting Congress (& Other US Policymakers)
The National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aftermath By M. Simon
Recent reports from Israel in a Ma’ariv article (excerpts and further commentary can be read here) indicate that the Israeli Army has an ongoing problem in even its most elite units. In a war against guerilla operations, as in fact the Palestinian operations against Israeli civilians are, civilians take the brunt of the counter offensive. The guerillas depend on this counter reaction to maintain sympathy for their cause among the general population in which they hide. In fact the crack down on civilians is one of the desired results of guerilla operations from at least the time of the Spanish guerilla operations against the troops of Napoleon.
This necessity for cracking down on the civilians has caused a lot of pain and suffering among even the elite of the Israeli soldiers. No doubt causing the opposing soldiers to lose their humanity is also one of the desired results of guerilla operations. As the opposing soldiers lose their humanity once they are removed from the battle situations they lose their self respect. On the other side of the coin, as chronicled by B.H.L.Hart in his book “Strategy”, the countries where guerilla operations by outlaw segments of the population are extensive become ungovernable for long periods of time after the war. This is because guerrillas are under no command and are recruited mainly from outlaw segments of the population. In fact Spain is still suffering from the results of the fighting of the wars against Napoleon by guerilla operations. So the aftermath of the War in Israel is likely to be bad for all concerned for at least decades to come, no matter who wins.
The Ma’ariv article, though, is concerned not with the long term aftermath but the immediate hurt of the Israeli soldiers. The hurt of “shell shock”. The hurt of doing unspeakable things to fellow humans in order to fight a war. In America today we have a name for this condition. We call it PTSD and we know that it affects not only soldiers but victims of rape and severe child abuse among others. We also know that one of the symptoms of this problem is substance abuse.
People will take anything to numb the pain. Heroin, alcohol, pot, MDMA, LSD. Any thing in the hope of relief.
Israeli soldiers visiting Thailand often come back with severe cases of heroin abuse. Other soldiers take other drugs in an effort to clear their minds of distressing memories. So many have these problems that there is a village in Israel specifically designed to help those suffering from the effects of war. That Village is called Izun. Ma’ariv stated “Israeli army reserve lieutenant-colonel Omri Frish, a social worker by training, organized the village. ‘ We were staggered by the number of calls we got. We got more then 900 calls from parents with very painful stories of sons becoming drug addicts, trying to commit suicide and generally emotionally distressed.’ “
America has embarked on a war which I hope will free the suffering citizens of Iraq from the terror of Saddam Hussein. But, whatever happens, we know that we are going to get back a lot of soldiers wounded in the mind as well as the body. After every war we have the stereotypical stories of the returned soldiers becoming addicted to alcohol and/or illegal drugs. We need to look on these addictions as symptoms of deeper problems not their causes. We need to heal these men and women who fought in our name, not discard or persecute them because of their symptoms.
In fact, we need to treat all so called “victims of addiction” as the victims of pain they actually are.
If the current war teaches us nothing else it will have gone a very long way towards the healing of America and, in addition, the world. Then those who have died on either side of the battle will not have died in vain
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Genetic Discrimination
In America we pride ourselves on the fact that we have eliminated almost all forms of arbitrary discrimination in our political and criminal justice systems. I think this is a good thing and in many ways makes America so much better than the rest of the world. For example it is very difficult no matter how long you or your ancestors have lived in Germany for a “non German” to become a citizen. The same is true in Japan and many other countries of the world. Adapting to the language and the laws of your adopted country is not enough if your heritage is not correct. It is attitudes like these that made the fascism of Germany and Japan so vicious. The fascism may be gone but many of the attitudes that spawned that fascism remain.
Yet America, improving though it is, is far from perfect. There is one form of discrimination that is very popular among the majority of Americans. That discrimination is no different from racism which is in effect a genetic discrimination. This discrimination that is so popular is also a genetic discrimination but it’s marker is not as obvious as skin color. It’s marker is addiction. To sex, to food, to alcohol, to tobacco, to illegal drugs. When it comes to those marked by genetics for a possible illegal drug addiction we come down on them with the full weight of the law. We put them in jail, we steal their property, we make them subject to what can only be called gestapo raids at 3 AM in the morning. And like the good Germans we are, not only do we say nothing for fear of the gestapo coming to our doors, some of us actually applaud this effort to make the country safer from the Jews. I mean addicts. The horror of the effort to eliminate the Jews of Central Europe is not that it was a crime unique to Germany. The horror is that given the right propaganda it can be done by any government any where. Even in America.
The genetics of addiction is a very interesting subject. There appears to be a number of genes involved depending on the addiction. In some cases there are not enough copies of a gene to protect the body from addiction. This seems to be the problem in the case of tobacco addiction and the TPH 779C alle. In addition a version of the dopamine transporter gene (SLC6A3-9) seems to protect people to some extent from tobacco addictions. Carriers of this gene who do start the tobacco habit find it easier to give up than those who have a different version. In addition those with the D 2 dopamine receptor (DRD2) in addition to the SLC6A3-9 gene had even fewer problems with tobacco.
Another interesting finding in relation to the tobacco metabolizing protein that is controlled by the CYP2A6 alle is that there are different types of that gene in the body depending on whether one is Caucasian, Asian, or African American. So we see that for tobacco “addictions” there may actually be racial differences that align with genetic differences.
Let us look at the mutation of another gene the FAAH 385. This gene helps produce an enzyme called fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH). This enzyme is responsible for neutralizing cannabinoids that naturally occur in the body. These naturally occurring body chemicals are the same as the psychoactive component of marijuana. So the body can produce it’s own marijuana and destroy it. All without the intervention of drug dealers and the police. Roger Pertwee, professor of neuropharmacology at Aberdeen University says that if you have a mutated copy of the gene you may need more cannibinoids than the body produces to feel normal. He says that this may be one of the reasons that cannabis use is so popular among ten to twenty percent of the population. He also says that genetics accounts for about one half of the nature of addiction.
Let us see if we can account for the other half. A study by the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry in Munich reported here: http://www.msnbc.com/news/788294.asp?cp1=1 shows that one of the functions of the cannibinoid system in the body is to help deal with painful memorizes. Now from an evolutionary stand point remembering painful memories can be very helpful if that memory keeps you out of further danger. It is also true though that remembering them for too long can paralyze the ability to act even when necessary. So it is good to remember the pain but generally it is also good, if the pain is not repeated, to gradually forget the memories so a person an “get over it” and get on with life. For some people without the cannibinoid receptor (in the study mice were used) or with out enough cannibinoid production or possibly a system that destroys the cannibinoids prematurely pain memories can be a problem.
In dealing with the human condition we now have a name for those who have problems dealing with long term pain memories. We call them PTSD sufferers. We see them as victims of war, domestic violence, child abuse, and on the job trauma such as firemen and police officers. We know that not all of them have trouble even with very painful memories and now we know why.
There is not only a trauma component but also a genetic component. v So in the end it comes down to this. We are making war on people based on their genetics and their suffering. I can think of nothing so unAmerican and unChristian. And yet, sadly, it is not the first such episode in America. I think it is incumbent on us all to make sure it is the last.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These articles (c) M. Simon - All rights reserved. Permission granted for one time use in a single periodical. Concurrent publication on the periodical’s www site is also granted.
M. Simon is an industrial controls engineer for Space-Time Productions and a Free Market Green and political activist. Write to M. Simon: email.
Posted by on 09/21 at 06:19 PM
#
Pravda ran an article in January claiming that Saddam had
recovered a crashed UFO and was going to use its military secrets against the United States.As for the other two sources,
is run by the Resist! Collective, which is run by… well, see for yourself:
We are committed to providing communications infrastructure resources to those who we identify as allies in the struggle against capitalism and for a better world.Now, who is it that is leading the worldwide struggle ‘against capitalism’? Oh, I remember now--the same fellows who made up the “CIA runs drugs” story back during the Cold War. Don’t believe me? Do a search on “Communist” using their built-in search engine, limiting it to only Resist! Collective websites. Result--230 hits.I can’t speak to Surrealist.org. I’m not sure, however, that it is necessary.
Posted by
Grim on 09/21 at 07:48 PM
#
Grim, read your link on Saddam’s UFO. Who knows what is Russia’s National Enquirer equivalent? I saw the small shopping carts and empty shelves in the former Soviet Union. There is truth, lies, and everything in between in their papers and to a lesser extent, possibly, in ours.
As far as the drug expose, I would not have believed anything about complicity in drugs involving authorities, namely police, until I saw it with my own eyes.
Posted by
Steven G. Erickson on 09/21 at 08:43 PM
#
I have to admit--I hate Communists. I spent some time living in the People’s Republic of China, outside the bigger cities and out where you can see what’s going on. Frankly, any man or woman who lives in the free world, with free access to the truth about what Communism is and does, and who still declares for Communism--that man, that woman is filth.
It’s close to the last real prejudice I have.
Posted by
Grim on 09/21 at 10:40 PM
#
Have no love for Socialism nor Communism. Those I talked to in Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia pretty much all expounded on how bad communism is. Their economies are not coming up as fast as they could after the fall of the USSR, and that can be a concern.
I have to say that I am alarmed at how much influence a shrinking number of corporations have over the US and world as they merge. There are less major sources of news in the US, as they also merge.
Posted by
Steven G. Erickson on 09/22 at 04:43 AM
#
I got more flack from Stafford police and Connecticut State Police for complaining about drug dealing and other crimes occurring on my property than than did the perpetrators of the crimes.
I was told I was not allowed downtown by a police officer, if I was not using drugs, or why should I want to be downtown? They had an agenda of what property and assets they were targeting in an investigation. If a citizen got in the way, namely me, they went down, not the common criminals and drug users that are an army of informants that help the police in revenue collection and asset confiscation.
Having not seen a lot with my own eyes, I would not have believed the extent of the BS involving downtown law enforcement and how they actually may increase drug use, alcoholism, delinquency of minors, blight, crime, and hurt small business and property investors in their crackheadlike pursuit of assets and cash taken in high profile busts of middlemen.
If authorities were really interested in reducing crime, criminals would be punished when caught, not used to get bigger fish for bigger takes.
If police actually did their jobs and reduced drugs and crimes, they could see their ranks and political influence wane.
Downtown areas are safe for common criminal parasites, alcoholics, frauds, drug users, and corporate and government use, but not for most small businesses and individual property investors as I can personally attest. -Steven G. Erickson
P.S. for those of you that have not see my previous posts, I went to prison and lost my property after having complained about crime and drugs on my property. The drug dealers, frauds, vandals, and other criminals in my former little corner of the world, Stafford Springs, CT, I hear are doing fine and still living as blood suckers on those that work and pay taxes. I fear getting railroaded back to prison for continuing to speak out about my injustice.
Posted by
Steven G. Erickson on 09/22 at 05:21 AM
#
Have no love for Socialism nor Communism. Those I talked to in Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia pretty much all expounded on how bad communism is. Their economies are not coming up as fast as they could after the fall of the USSR, and that can be a concern.
I have to admit--I hate Communists. I spent some time living in the People’s Republic of China, outside the bigger cities and out where you can see what’s going on. Frankly, any man or woman who lives in the free world, with free access to the truth about what Communism is and does, and who still declares for Communism--that man, that woman is filth.
grim and steve.
you give examples of dysfunctional communism. why dont you take a look at this:
http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/classics/manifesto.html and maybe you will be able to understand communism’s true intent. your opinions make sense, only they are based on irrational dictatrships and not any true communist state. there is no existing state which coinsides with the marxist theory of communism. its people who are uneducated about communism who give it the stigma it has. you may as well be mccarthy for all i care. its thoroughly ridiculous.
Society can no longer live under this bourgeoisie, in other words, its existence is no longer compatible with society… Proletarians of the world - UNITE! (Marx)
Posted by
mel on 09/22 at 10:22 AM
#
and grim. prejudice is exactly what it says it is: prejudging something without adequate knowlege. and yet you still admit to being prejudiced? way to be! you’ve basically given anyone license to discredit your unresearched point of view.
Posted by
mel on 09/22 at 10:25 AM
#
Mel,
I know from your earlier posts that you are twenty years old. I will therefore be gentle, because I realize your experience of the world is limited.
Do you honestly think I’ve never seen the Communist Manifesto before? Well, I have: I have read and studied it, and Das Kapital, Lenin’s Imperialism: The Final Stage of Captialism, as well as the less famous writings and letters of Karl Marx, and the formal response to Marx by economist Joseph Schumpeter. I hold a Masters of Arts in history, and I have made a full study of the history of socialism and Communism.
I have also had, as I mentioned above, the experience of living in a Communist country. You can not imagine the harm done to a society by having thirty million (this being the lowest estimate, with the upper estimate being sixty million) of its people starved for no other reason than that the government made a policy change. “The good of the People’s Republic” demanded an increase in the production of iron and steel ingots, so the government mandated it. The local bureaucracies enforced it even on farmers, who could only make iron and steel ingots by melting down their tools. With no tools, there could be no planting and no harvesting; and so millions of people died of starvation.
Of course, there was food elsewhere--in the free world. We would have shared it. But the government couldn’t admit its bad judgement, because the “good of the People’s revolution!” required that they not show faulty judgement. They therefore denied the famine existed, and refused any aid. Between thirty and sixty million died, I repeat.
But this is all ancient history--right? Well, no. The Chinese government did just exactly the same thing with AIDS, declaring that the PRC was AIDS-free until two years ago, when they admitted at last that the rate of infection in many parts of rural China is as high as 100%. Over the next few years, millions are going to die again.
My prejudice is the result of having reached a point at which there is no new evidence to consider, just new people with the same old arguments. There IS NO FUNCTIONING COMMUNISM. There never will be. Marx’s economic models are simply wrong, as Schumpeter showed; and the attempt to force the society to conform to a broken model ruins whatever was right with the economy. At the same time, the force required to do that establishes tyranny, which tyranny is used to cover up the “mistakes” rather than admit them.
Millions have died from it. Millions more are going to die from it. Their death warrants are already signed--in sick and starving North Korea, in AIDS-ravaged “socialist” Africa, in Vietnam as in rural China, they are already dead. They just haven’t stopped breathing. Or suffering.
That is as gently as it may be put.
Posted by
Grim on 09/22 at 11:10 AM
#
Grim Age doesn’t denote stupidity. You can be as blatant as you want with me… I’m graduating with a bachelors in history next spring and i plan to go on with school until I have a Ph.D. I’ve lived in two other countries, including “socialist” Canada. I don’t hold my views because I’m uneducated. I understand you may have degrees, but that doesn’t say anything about your true intellect (nor mine). It’s pretty irrelevent if you ask me. What you are describing is NOT Marxist communism. I’m not a communist, and therefor I am not trying to defend communism; however, it really should be differentiated from what you are describing. As I see it, you are describing, basically, the Dan Rather version of the world. It’s not TRUE, Grim! I mean, what you’re saying, the facts and the figures, are true, but what they inherently are, just simply does not describe communism, even if the people partaking in this political systems call it that. It’s easy to have a dictatorship when you pass it off as communism. It’s easy to be white power and pass it off as imperialism. It’s blatantly selling out. “The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones. In bourgeois society, living labor is but a means to increase accumulated labor. In communist society, accumulated labor is but a means to widen, to enrich, to promote the existence of the laborer. “ This is not what you are describing. What you are describing is dictatorial despotism. You are right Grim, when you say that there is no functioning communism. But, you also say that you have had a terrible experience living in a communist country. And yet, you admit that there is no functioning communism in this world? So, how can you condemn something that has yet to be, Grim??!?!?!!?! That’s all I’m saying. What you’re saying just doesn’t add up. It just DOESN’T MAKE SENSE. Age is nothing but a number. You don’t need to talk to me like I’m a child.
Posted by
mel on 09/22 at 04:32 PM
#
What I am telling you is that Marxist Communism and dictatorial Communism are the same.
You start off
to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mindbut you end up, very quickly, with purges and mass graves.The reason for this is that Marxist economics are a false model.
The great problem, even in Lenin’s day, was why Marx’s predicted Revolution had not happened. Lenin chose to explain it by making reference to imperialism by which--he argued--the existing powers drained the resources of the undeveloped world to maintain, for a while longer, the industrial capitalist system.
But this, of course, could not last forever (he further argued). It would only serve to bring the undeveloped world into the capitalist system, to turn the masses of peasants and serfs into proles, and therefore it would heighten the great revolution when it came.We’re a hundred years on from there, and still no great revolution.
Capitalism humms on cheerfully--in America, which accounts for
sixty percent of the world’s economic growth. Does that mean America is doing what Lenin argued, sucking the wealth out of the world? Hardly.
America maintains a massive trade imbalance in the world’s favor--that is, all that produced wealth isn’t accumulated in America, but flows from America. That is why the US economy was described by Clinton’s economic advisor (as quoted in the Economist piece above) as ‘the world flying on one engine.’You say that none of this should matter--that if we could just really do it, just really make Communism, it would be everything Marx dreamed.
Lenin set out to try. He was a true believer. Mao set out to try. He was a true believer too.
Both of them were well-versed in Marxist and later Communist theories--in Lenin’s case, he was well-enough versed to have been a leading composer of them. What happened was not an accident. Above I cite only the mistakes of Communism, not its intentional mass-murder, but the mass deaths that resulted from tyrannical bad judgement. Let’s look now at the intentional killings, as a way of illuminating why “true” Communism is in fact just what we’re looking at in the Soviet Union and Communist China.
You take over a country, by revolution, just as the Communist Manifesto calls for. Great. What now? Well, first you assert that you and your fellow Vanguardians are going to be asserting the Common Control of the Means of Production, which means practically that you are going to be telling people where they will work and what they will produce.
You start making decisions and giving orders. So far, everything is going according to plan.A year or so on, things start getting weird. There’s a famine--there is always a famine, because Marxist theory is centered on industry and doesn’t adequately address the question of food production. The Soviet Union’s food production regime resulted in about seven and a half million dead; China’s, thirty to sixty million. Cuba’s famine was held off by Soviet grain shipments… so it arrived promptly in 1991, as soon as the Berlin wall fell. Famine is constant in states that try to follow Marx’s model. Of course, you’d do it differently--you understand the mechanisms of food production, don’t you, better than Lenin, Mao, and their legions of professionals, educators, thinkers, and bureaucrats?Well, the famines lead to riots and a new revolution. That has to be put down. The apparatus of the State, which was meant to be withering way, suddenly looks pretty necessary to keeping the State from falling apart. That would lead to chaos, as well as people producing things to sell--claiming to own land, or fruit, which is the root of exploitation. You can’t allow that. So you call out the Army. (Or you don’t. End of Communism. The new revolution institutes market reforms and spits on your tomb. Not surprisingly, no Communist government ever took this route.)Well, you finally get the famine under control--mostly by reducing the size of your population until you can feed them with your existing agricultural policies--but you find that your suppression of the revolution has led to large parts of the country being turned against you. Unsatisfactorialy, these include the thinkers, who feel that you’ve moved away from the goal of withering off the state. They begin to agitate for a new revolution. Thus the purgers, the Gulags, or the Cultural Revolution. (Of course you’d let them carry on, wouldn’t you? That’s what Mao said he’d do too--"let a Hundred Flowers bloom, let a hundred schools of thought contend.” When it led to rebellion, he had to kill them all to save the State.)This isn’t an accident. This isn’t a perversion of Marx’s dream. These are the natural, unavoidable consequences of following Marx’s dream. His models don’t work. Trying to enforce them destroys the economy and creates situations in which mass killings are unavoidable. This is “true” Communism--they all started off toward the same place you think you want to go. They were all supported by legions of true believers, and the best minds of their age.
This is where they all ended up. There is no other end to this road.You say age is just a number, but it’s a number to which you ought to cling. The only excuse you have for supporting this great dream is not being old enough to have learned your history, or widely-enough traveled to have seen where that dream leads. In time, when age isn’t just a number to you, you may say as I do: the teachers you have had, who have taught you to believe in this old poison, this mother of homicide, they have dealt falsely with their charge; they have betrayed the trust laid on them by mankind.
Posted by
Grim on 09/22 at 06:32 PM
#
If communism is dying or dead, then there should not be any aspects of it the USA, right Hillary?
Posted by
Steve Erickson on 09/22 at 08:42 PM
#
You say age is just a number, but it’s a number to which you ought to cling. The only excuse you have for supporting this great dream is not being old enough to have learned your history, or widely-enough traveled to have seen where that dream leads.
how do you know im not widely enough traveled, or old enough for anything? i bet that im more traveled than most people here on this site. how can you judge like that??
In time, when age isn’t just a number to you, you may say as I do: the teachers you have had, who have taught you to believe in this old poison, this mother of homicide, they have dealt falsely with their charge; they have betrayed the trust laid on them by mankind.
i have had no teachers but myself and my own studies which advocated any kind of socialism or communism. as i said, I AM NOT A COMMUNIST. what you are saying is true. what i am saying is that THEORETICALLY, communism is not bad.
i am not waiting for the day when it arrives. i fully expect to live in “democracy” (the kind with no female or minority presidents, and the kind that gives tax breaks to the wealthy and exploits and undermines the poor) for the rest of my life.
im not arguing for the sake of argument. im dissenting because i care. because i dont believe in the american dream (joke). because ive been screwed and socialism (the means by which communism is achieved)is the outlet by which i feel that I could best suceed. I, not AMERICA or any other country, place, thing. that’s all.
I’m so sick of all the anti-communist sentiment. as you can see in my recent post, these are the attitudes which maintain the white man’s burden. these are the attitudes with which our society will decline.
so, yay for democracy, and yay for capitalism. rome wasn’t built in a day, nor in a day did she fall. but in the end, we SHALL be as the city upon the hill.
Posted by
mel on 09/22 at 10:29 PM
#
As you say, things are not done in a day. We have had enough lessons on this topic for a space, though perhaps we will return to the topic some other day. There is much left to be said of Communism, and the mindset behind it:
“Not with the humour of hunters Or savage skill in war, But ordering all things with dead words, Strings shall they make of beasts and birds, And wheels of wind and star.”
Since you have chosen poetry as your next battlefield in the war against the evil, minority-hating, white-man’s West, I shall join you above. Never let it be said I passed by a hazel-fence’d field.
Posted by
Grim on 09/23 at 12:05 AM
#
In the former USSR, dept heads could send rivals for affection to their demise, squash opposition and alternative viewpoints, live ‘high on the hog’ as compared to the average citizen when all are considered equal and paid equally. The true essence of Karl Marx writings are more like misguided poetry than a real plan.
Communism and Socialism are disgusting and are anti Free Speech.
We live in dangerous times and are at a pivotal point. The powers that the Elite in the former USSR are now even a closer reality for our ‘Elite’ with the passage of the Patriot Act.
Abuse of power, squashing opposition covertly, and covering up illegal acts and inefficiency to keep one’s job are all aspects of a very unpatriotic act, The Patriot Act.
Free Speech has taken a major hit. -Steven G. Erickson
Posted by
Steve Erickson on 09/23 at 07:12 AM
#