Sunday, June 05, 2005

This just in by email regarding DCF:


"Connecticut DCF Watch"

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 07:38:29 -0400

[connecticutcivilrightscouncil] News Conference outside federal court house in Hartford, CT on Monday June 6, 2005

From: Connecticut DCF Watch
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 7:36 AM
Subject: News Conference outside federal court house in Hartford, CT on Monday June 6, 2005

On Monday, June 6, 2005, I will be arguing our case before the Second Circuit court of Appeals starting at 9:30 am via video link with New York. I have 10 mins, the State of Connecticut has 5 mins and the other three attorneys have 2 mins each.

In all 50 states, the government has striped and has set aside the constitutional rights of a class of American worse than the 50's and 60's. Not only is this unlawful but in contempt of Constitution. The states along with child protection and the state's attorney lack the jurisdiction to determine what Americans are entitled to when it comes to their constitutional protection.

This new class of individuals are called parents v. non-parents. In other words, if you are a non-parent and you commit a crime against a child and your not related, you are entitled to the full protection of the constitution. If you are a parent and commit the same crime against a child that is related to you, the state breaks the law and not only strips you of your rights, they have instructions for state officials how to violate those rights.

The public and the media does not realize that if you are a parent, you are not entitled to due process, equal protection, rules of evidence and you are not allowed to confront your accuser even though the 6th Amendment gives you that right. You are not allowed to challenge all of the testimony entered into court records or able to question the accuser or the child to see if DCF ask the child to lie or what they may have said.

These civil right deprivation of Americans nationwide is of epic proportion and this case will be a landmark decision that will effect every child and parent in the U.S. Here the states have one group of government officials that are told not to violation any American constitutional rights. But then you have another group of government officials that are specifically instructed to break the law and to violate the rights of Americans who happen to be parents.

The higher courts have stated that it is not relevant if the state is investigating crimes against adults or children, that does not effect the rights of the accused and has no relevance on whether is guilty or not guilty.

The higher courts have ruled all over the country and hold that Child Protection workers are government officials and must comply with the constitutional prohibitions that are placed on all officials. If it is illegal, unlawful and unconstitutional for the police, likewise it is for caseworkers. This is not open for any arguments.

Feel free to call me if you have any questions.


Thomas M. Dutkiewicz, President
Special Family Advocate
Connecticut DCF Watch
P.O. Box 3005
Bristol, CT 06011-3005

* * * *

I do not check spelling, nor do I correct grammar of posts emailed into me.

This blogger's email:

Getting Tarred and Feathered in Modern America

Did the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights, The CHRO, actually follow up on a complaint of a former Manchester Connecticut Police Officer, Keith Hassell?


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

View My Stats