Monday, July 17, 2006

The Kill Humans Zoo

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Tests on human volunteers were carried out until 1989

MoD tests on humans 'unethical'

Some trials of chemical agents on human volunteers at Porton Down laboratories were "unethical", according to a report published by the Ministry of Defence.

The report says a number of tests in the 1940s and 1950s involved "serious departures" from the ethical standards that should have been observed.

But the report's independent ethical assessor said concerns related to only a few of the hundreds of tests done.

Sir Ian Kennedy said they had never gone beyond what should be tolerated.

Professor Kennedy oversaw the work of MoD officials conducting a historical survey of tests at Porton Down, launched in 2000 in response to the concerns of veterans that they may have suffered lasting damage to their health.

He said there was "no evidence to justify a conclusion that the conduct of the trials at any point went beyond the limits of what should ever be contemplated, far less tolerated, in a civilised society".

Nerve agents

Among the tests Professor Kennedy highlighted which he felt may not have met ethical standards were:

  • Trials of liquid nerve agents on bare skin, carried out between 1951 and 1953, including one test which led to the death of 20-year-old Leading Aircraftman Ronald Maddison in 1953

  • The trials in 1951 of the nerve agent GD, in which the lethal dose was not known with sufficient certainty

  • The trial in 1958 of the nerve agent VX, which involved the use of what, at the time, was regarded as the lethal dose

  • The trials in 1942 involving the exposure of volunteers to H vapour in the scrotal region, in which he said it appeared likely volunteers gave no real consent

  • The trial in 1945 of a substance from captured German shells, which exposed volunteers to danger without first seeking to determine the nature of the substance

    Moral standards

    He also said there were "question marks" over experiments carried out from the 1950s to the 1970s in which the eye condition miosis was artificially induced, which he said "might be said by some to have constituted too great a step into the unknown".

    But Professor Kennedy said the tests were carried out in "a thorough, painstaking, careful and often ingenious manner" and were "obviously of great importance in assessing military effectiveness".

    And he cautioned against judging the researchers involved against the moral standards of today's comparatively peaceful world.

    "The work was conducted at Porton in difficult times," he said.

    National security

    In response to the report, the MoD said in a statement: "These trials must be viewed in the context of the Second World War and the Cold War and their associated pressures.

    "The nation was facing a real threat and these trials were essential for national security in that context.

    "Much has changed in law and ethics in the half century since many of these experiments and there is a danger in seeking to apply today's standards when those reflect evolution over that period and did not represent the prevailing standards at the relevant time."

    It added: "The Ministry of Defence is very grateful to all those whose participation in studies at Porton Down made possible the research to provide safe and effective protection for UK Armed Forces."


  • No charges over Porton Down tests

    * * * *

    Lisa Masterson said the below and had her kids taken away. Welcome America to the UK. Masterson was then put in a mental hospital, she is silent and afraid. Imagine being threatened that you may never see your kids again?


    Lyme Disease Cover-up

    Lisa Masterson 06.04.2006 18:19 Anti-militarism Bio-technology Health South Coast World

    Lyme disease is a sensitive matter for the US (and associated governments') military. They would prefer the public to believe that the illness is "hard-to-catch", "easy-to-cure" and totally unsuitable as a neurological incapacitating agent. This is a lie.
    Now a simple microscopy technique might help many patients confirm what the government-backed health agencies deny.

    Lyme disease is, for countless patients, a chronic, devastating, incapacitating disease. However, most patients in the US and western Europe find it very hard to get correct diagnosis and treatment.

    The reason? Lyme disease, caused by a bacteria, and often aggravated by co-infections with other pathogens acquired at the same time from a tick-bite, is a matter of intense interest to bioweaponeers. As a result, government-backed health agencies such as the NIH, CDC in US, Eucalb in Europe, HPA in Britain etc are deliberately suppressing factual evidence regarding this disease. Their aim is to make the public believe that it is a trivial "hard-to-catch", "easily-cured" infection, which almost never incapacitates.

    This is a lie.

    One of the biggest hurdles that adults and children face when they acquire Lyme disease is simply being diagnosed correctly. Often, this is because their intensely disabling symptoms such as crushing fatigue, memory loss, severe pains (often migrating from one location to the next), sound sensitivity, weakness etc are dismissed as "subjective" by their doctor, especially when routine tests come up normal. They may then be told they are "somatising", hypochondriacs, malingering, or otherwise have a psychological cause for their illness.

    One of the first priorities of a bioweaponeer when designing a biological weapon is to ensure that the agent evades detection. A bacteria or other pathogen that does not leave telltale signs on routine tests is ideal, from the twisted point of view of the men who make microbes to maim and murder.

    Unable to gather objective signs or markers of the illness, the medical professionals of the target population are at a loss to identify the agent that has been used, much less to give correct treatment in time. In Lyme, if treatment is not given right at the beginning, chronic, persistent or recurring disablement is often the result.

    The bacteria that causes Lyme disease is of the genus Borrelia, the same as that which causes Relapsing Fever. Both tick-borne and louse-borne relapsing fevers have historically been devastating illnesses for humans, especially in wartime, when people are living in prison camps or otherwise under terrible conditions. These often fatal diseases are endemic in many of the poorest nations.

    The relapsing fever borrelia is extremely difficult to culture, so the traditional method of diagnosing this borrelia was by viewing a drop of blood under a darkfield microscope. Darkfield is necessary because the width of the spiral-shaped germs is so thin.

    Are Lyme borrelia really so different? Could doctors not do the same, to detect this borrelia in Lyme patients' blood?

    Ever since the early 1980's, when Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) officer Alan Barbour was reported as having cultured the Lyme bacteria for the first time, the public and the scientific profession has been assured that it is almost impossible to view Lyme borrelia in blood. (The EIS is an elite, quasi-military unit of Infectious Disease specialists run under the auspices of the American Center for Disease Control, the CDC. It was created in the McCarthyite era for the purpose of offensive biowarfare R&D, which at the time, was legal. Today, Barbour is head of a new biowarfare "centre of excellence" at UCI in Irvine, California.)

    Barbour and the rest of the government-backed Steere camp (after Allen Steere, "discoverer" of Lyme, and also an EIS officer at the time) state that there is simply no use searching for Lyme borrelia in blood, and that it is only present there in tiny numbers, or not at all. Doctors have been encouraged to rely instead on antibody detecting tests, such as Elisa or Western Blot.

    But these tests are notoriously insensitive, especially as Lyme borrelia, like their cousins which cause the relapsing fevers, practise the tactic of "antigenic variation" . This means swapping outer surface antigens (antigens are proteins that cause your body's immune cells to produce specific antibodies against them), bringing out **new** antigens which fool the immune system, just when it had managed to get the production of defensive antibodies against the first set started. The result is that many very ill patients will not show up on the antibody tests.

    Researchers studying the disease have always been encouraged to grow blood or other samples in the BSK culture medium before viewing under darkfield. The "B" in "BSK stands for Barbour. Could Alan Barbour, of the EIS, have given the world a medium that is only good for growing certain sub-types of borrelia, ie especially those that are "easily cured in three weeks", and rarely incapacitating, but not very good at growing the actual borrelia sub-types that afflict the majority of patients?

    That would explain why several European doctors, **not** following the dictates of the Steere camp, have been able to see the live borrelia in both the traditional spiral-form and the cell wall deficient forms, under darkfield microscope, in an ordinary drop of blood, which has not been cultured in BSK medium.

    Mark Stroud is a Lyme sufferer who has built his own darkfield microscope from easily available parts. He has seen and filmed what appear to be borrelia and possibly cell wall deficient borrelial forms too, in a simple drop of his own blood (and of others). Prior to testing his blood, Mark had PCR (polymerase chain reaction) confirmation of the presence of Lyme borrelia in his blood. PCR is extremely specific, as it is based on unique sequences of DNA. In other words, if you have a positive PCR for borreliosis, it is very, very unlikely you have something else instead.

    Please visit Mark's website at www.lyme-diagnosis.org.uk .I know Mark personally and can assure you he is not selling anything. If you or a loved one is suffering Lyme disease, please ask your doctor to view a simple drop of blood under darkfield as Mark has done, or, if your doctor will not do it , try to get access to a darkfield microscope yourself. If possible, film and record your results.

    I have had constant harassment, internet hacking attempts, and death threats since I first suggested publicly that the facts regarding Lyme disease have been deliberately suppressed by the US government -backed Steere camp. However, in the last few weeks, the harassment has become much more intense, since talking to Mark Stroud about the possibility of Lyme patients, en masse, viewing ordinary blood smears under videomicroscopy, without culture in BSK medium first.

    I take it the US government, and allied governments, such as my own in Britain, are very frightened of the prospect of patients trying this out for themselves.

    If anyone has tried to view their blood under darkfield microscopy and would like to discuss their findings, please email me at lymerayja AT yahoo.co.ukremovespam (Please remove "removespam" and replace "at" with "@".) Thank you.

    Lisa Masterson
    6 April 2006
    5 pm

    * * * *

    This post accepts anonymous comments. To share this post, click on white envelope below.

    This blogger's email: stevengerickson@yahoo.com


    * * * *

    The Philosophy of keeping Blacks from reproducing and confined

    Excerpt: (the below found here)

    On Muslims

    Among the Muslim community in the United States, Pipes is generally regarded as a controversial character. [29]


    "There is no escaping the unfortunate fact that Muslim government employees in law enforcement, the military, and the diplomatic corps need to be watched for connections to terrorism, as do Muslim chaplains in prisons and the armed forces. Muslim visitors and immigrants must undergo additional background checks. Mosques require a scrutiny beyond that applied to churches, synagogues, and temples. Muslim schools require increased oversight to ascertain what is being taught to children." --The Jerusalem Post, January 22, 2003 p.9

    "Western European societies are unprepared for the massive immigration of brown-skinned peoples cooking strange foods and maintaining different standards of hygiene...All immigrants bring exotic customs and attitudes, but Muslim customs are more troublesome than most." (National Review, November 19, 1990)

    On his website, Daniel Pipes notes that the above quote "has over the years attracted considerable attention. My goal in this article ([30]) was to characterize the thinking of Western Europeans, not give my own views. In retrospect, I should either have put the words "brown-skinned peoples" and "strange foods" in quotation marks or made it clearer that I was explaining European attitudes rather than my own. By way of example of those attitudes, here are some quotations from top French politicians from that era" Following this are quotes from Jacques Chirac, François Mitterrand and Valery Giscard d'Estaing.

    Of African-American Muslims, Pipes wrote: "...black converts tend to hold vehemently anti-American, anti-Christian, and anti-Semitic attitudes." (Commentary, June 1, 2000)

    In an October 16, 1997 article in the The Jewish Exponent, Pipes claimed that "as the population of Muslims in the United States grows, so does antisemitism." ("The New Anti-Semitism," [31])

    An article in the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs written by Sister Elaine Kelley, Chair of "Friends of Sabeel—North America" (a support group for the Palestinian Christian anti-Zionist[32] groupSabeel), July 2001, claims that Pipes told an audience at Portland State University that "Arab people live in some of the worse conditions in the world, without freedom to travel or modern media." He blamed those conditions on the Arabs’ "political obsession with Israel" (instead of their own societies); according to Kelley he added "The Palestinians are a miserable people, and they deserve to be"[33] but Pipes denies ever saying this.[34]

    "The bombing on February 22 of the Askariya shrine in Samarra, Iraq, was a tragedy, but it was not an American or a coalition tragedy. ... [W]hen Sunni terrorists target Shi'ites and vice versa, non-Muslims are less likely to be hurt. ... Civil war in Iraq, in short, would be a humanitarian tragedy but not a strategic one." (New York Sun, February 28, 2006 [35])

    In a speech to the American Jewish Congress in October 2001, he said:

    I worry very much, from the Jewish point of view, that the presence, and increased stature, and affluence, and enfranchisement of American Muslims, because they are so much led by an Islamist leadership, that this will present true dangers to American Jews. [36]

    * * * *

    The below found here

    The Sunday Times - Review
    Page 1 Page 2 Page 3
    If you are willing to pay the price — a price that would amount to a British prison population of roughly 250,000 if your sentencing followed the American model — you can reduce crime dramatically.

    All of these are policies that the British political establishment may come to accept in another decade or so. If London were to get a mayor who decided to take the homeless off the streets, scrub away the graffiti and adopt a zero-tolerance policing policy, I suspect he would find the same surge in popularity that Rudy Giuliani experienced in New York.

    *
    British parents are increasingly vocal about their dissatisfaction with schools, and especially with their spinelessness in dealing with disruptive children. In every area of life that the underclass affects, the public mood is shifting towards support of the American solution.Politicians who covet votes will come around eventually.

    Hence my prediction that in 15 years, perhaps less, the underclass/Neet will no longer be a political issue in Britain and urban life for most of you will be more pleasant than it is now. The price will have been a great deal of money spent on prisons and, in effect, the writing-off of a portion of the population as unfit for civil society.

    In the United States I have called this the coming of custodial democracy — literally custodial for criminals, figuratively custodial for the neighbourhoods we seal away from the rest of us. Custodial democracy is probably headed your way.

    It is not a happy solution. On the contrary, it means abandoning a central tenet of a free society — that everyone can exercise equal responsibility for his or her own life. But Britain, like the United States and western Europe, is locked into a welfare state that by its nature generates large numbers of feckless people. If we are unwilling to prevent an underclass by giving responsibility for behaviour back to individuals, their families, and communities, custodial democracy is the only option left.

    Charles Murray is best known for Losing Ground, his 1984 book about welfare reform, and for The Bell Curve of 1994

    * * * *

    The former Governor of Connecticut's conspiracy to make Connecticut as White as possible (click)

    Excerpt: (found here)
    And as was also revealed this Sunday in the Courant:

    TREA- Tomasso, Ragaglia, Ellef, Alibozek (The "R" in TREA could have also been Marc S. Ryan or former Governor John G. Rowland), the acronym was allegedly found by an Assistant US Attorney investigating official Connecticut fraud practices with Alibozek's notes. Connecticut's abuse the public, enrich the Blue Bloods at the expense of the poor, costs American Federal Tax Payers, plenty. Much of the former abuse still continues.

    Complicated man, big dreamer, at center of federal probe
    January 5, 2004 , Associated Press

    HARTFORD, Conn. -- Peter Ellef was a big dreamer.

    ”As Gov. John G. Rowland's co-chief of staff, Ellef spoke of levitating trains, hydroponics gardening,

    building prisons in old stone quarries and opening trade relations with China.

    His plans after state service included developing a string of juvenile detention facilities across the

    country
    , a chain of home improvement stores and a high-end garden center.”

    DCF and Connecticut's Official Whore House

    * * * *
    * * * *

    The Grand Maul, Official, Police, Judge Post to Eat Sh*t and go F themselves Letter

    The Stark Raving Viking

    1 Comments:

    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    How do you know if you have Lyme Disease?

    Do you remember being bitten by a tick?.............. No__ Yes__
    when________
    Do you remember having the "bull's eye rash"? ..No__ Yes__
    Any other rash?.................................................... No__
    Yes__

    Have you had any of the following? CIRCLE ALL YES ANSWERS
    1.Unexplained fevers, sweats, chills, or flushing
    2.Unexplained weight change- (loss or gain- circle one)
    3.Fatigue, tiredness, poor stamina
    4.Unexplained hair loss
    5.Swollen glands: list areas_________________________________________
    6.Sore throat
    7.Testicular pain/pelvic pain
    8.Unexplained menstrual irregularity
    9.Unexplained milk production; breast pain
    10.Irritable bladder or bladder dysfunction
    11.Sexual dysfunction or loss of libido
    12.Upset stomach or abdominal pain
    13.Change in bowel function- (constipation, diarrhea)
    14.Chest pain or rib soreness
    15.Shortness of breath, cough
    16.Heart palpitations, pulse skips, heart block
    17.Any history of a heart murmur or valve prolapse?
    18.Joint pain or swelling: list
    joints_________________________________________________
    19.Stiffness of the joints or back
    20.Muscle pain or cramps
    21.Twitching of the face or other muscles
    22.Headache
    23.Neck creaks and cracks, neck stiffness, neck pain
    24.Tingling, numbness, burning or stabbing sensations, shooting pains, skin
    hypersensitivity
    25.Facial paralysis (Bell's Palsy)
    26.Eyes/Vision: double, blurry, increased floaters, light sensitivity
    27.Ears/Hearing: buzzing, ringing, ear pain, sound sensitivity
    28.Increased motion sickness, vertigo, poor balance
    29.Lightheadedness, wooziness, unavoidable need to sit or lie down
    30.Tremor
    31.Confusion, difficulty in thinking
    32.Difficulty with concentration, reading
    33.Forgetfulness, poor short term memory, poor attention, problem absorbing
    new information
    34.Disorientation: getting lost, going to wrong places
    35.Difficulty with speech or writing; word or name block
    36.Mood swings, irritability, depression
    37.Disturbed sleep- too much, too little, fractionated, early awakening
    38.Exaggerated symptoms or worse hangover from alcohol

    Sunday, October 29, 2006 6:02:00 AM  

    Post a Comment

    Links to this post:

    Create a Link

    << Home


    View My Stats