Sunday, June 25, 2006

Federal Tax Dollars used to abuse American Families

.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Philip and Meredith Inkel speak, 06-25-06, a quick video download

Here is an intact family.

Add your Federal Tax Dollars, they are used to hire a lawyer appointed for the children’s “best interest” the kids are taken away, placed in a foster home.

That is a win/win for a State.

The “processing” of people and children brings in Federal Tax Dollars, managing "schemes" and State "scams" brings in Tax Dollars, arresting parents on bogus charges brings in Federal Tax Dollars, imprisoning, and forcing State Programs and State mandated classes brings in Federal Dollars.

Your Tax Dollars give a State the Incentive to do wrong, not good.

This needs to change, please look as the Inkel Family as the modern day equivalent of “Little House on the Prairie” turned into “Nightmare on Average American-ville Street, USA”

Phil faces 6 months in prison for not being able to keep up with his child support payments. He will get out for a month, not being able to pay $10,000, and then go back in. You pay for his lodgings, his wife's lodging, and to bring up the children that the above married couple would have been perfectly willing and able to do themselves.

The State of Connecticut took one of his kids away and there hasn’t even been a proper hearing or paperwork filed, four years went by. The State of Connecticut needs to "gag" the Inkels from exposing State Official Crimes, so they can't sue for Civil and Human Rights Abuse.

That is official kidnapping, and Kangaroo Court proceeding which you are a willing participant as you have not said or done anything, have you not?

Take away your kids and make you pay money you can’t earn fast enough with a State doing everything in its power to disrupt your life, limit, and ruin you, WHAT???!!!

Meredith Inkel didn’t divorce her husband as the State of Connecticut wanted, so she would be an easier target to have her kids officially kidnapped, and she was told she wasn’t going to be appointed a lawyer, couldn’t compel witnesses to dispute the State’s bogus case, and the gag order also prevents her from reporting the State Abuse of their family to Federal Authorities and to alert the media.

Connecticut wants to kidnap kids from average families, and to displace the poorer, for the enriching of the rich, keeping the "riffraff" down and out, AND separate.

Connecticut is so corrupt no state official seems to get punished unless there is a newspaper or television story aired to embarrass the state into actually punishing or removing official criminals for wrongdoing.

The Assistant Connecticut Attorney General Wholean might have a hand in obstructing justice, fixing a court case, obstructing justice, racketeering, and covering gross sexual and procedural misconduct of the DCF and its Foster Family Child Abusers.

The Inkels might get prosecuted for the sexual assault of their children perpetrated on their children when they were taken away and abused in DCF foster care.

Are your Federal Tax Dollars supposed to be used for the sexual abuse of children, psychological trauma, and for ripping the average American family apart?

Do you want to pay for the above couple to be split up, jailed on bogus charges, imprisoned, and their children brought up by strangers all with your hard earned cash, Federal Tax Dollars you paid in, no matter where you live in America?

You paid for the Judicial Circus too, handsomely.

The lawyers, prosecutors, the judges, the police, the Department of Children and Families and other Official Child and Citizen Abusers get 6 figure incomes, a cushy retirement, and almost across the board immunity from prosecution, no matter how cruel and sociopathic they are.

Thanks, America.

You paid to make these children cry, and these adults to live a daily nightmare wondering when the axe will drop permanently severing their family.

The American Dream is mere cruel propaganda.

Meredith goes to court on the 28th, Phil has to turn himself into Connecticut Police on the 30th. Good Bye Family!

Their email: INKELFAMILY@aol.com

Making a complaint into DCF, is this typical of DCF?

* * * *

DCF Worker Charged With Domestic, Child Abuse

http://www.wftv.com/news/9426028/detail.html?treets=orlc&tid=2651334445813&tml=orlc_12pm&tmi=orlc_12pm_1_11000306262006&ts=HPOSTED: 11:46 am EDT June 26, 2006

CLERMONT, Fla. -- A Department of Children and Families case worker was arrested for domestic and child abuse over the weekend. Lorinda Nedelcove, of Clermont, was taken to the LakeCounty jail after allegedly beating up her girlfriend and girlfriend’s child. The victim said Nedelcove began striking her in the face with a closed fist, all because she was smoking a cigarette. When the victim’s child tried to pull Nedelcove off his mother, she started punching the boy. Deputies suspect Nedelcove had been drinking.
Copyright 2006 by wftv.com. All rights reserved.

* * * *

www.freespeech.com

http://starkravingviking.blogspot.com/

This post accepts anonymous comments. To share this post with a friend, click on white envelope.

This blogger's email: stevengerickson@yahoo.com

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Parents Face Prison and loss of kids for State to Hide Fed Crimes?

Phil Inkel of East Haddam, Connecticut, talks about his sons, both under 4, allegedly sexually abused in DCF Connecticut State care. Phil and the mother of Phil's Children, Meredith Inkel face prison, aren't allowed to have an appointed lawyer, can't defend themselves, compel witness and face prison and permanent removal of their children. A Connecticut Judge allegedly went on the record that the Inkels are gagged from speaking to Federal Authorities to report the Civil Rights abuses, and are banned from talking to media and even blogger, Steven G. Erickson. Please sound off to your elected officials on this one, no matter what state you live in. This is absolute B.S.

Phil Inkel audio clip 1, 5 min
this is an audio post - click to play

Phil Inkel audio clip 2, 5 min
this is an audio post - click to play

Phil Inkel audio clip 3, 5 min
this is an audio post - click to play
Inkel family photos and more information, click here

Saturday, June 17, 2006

Where’s the Milk Carton on this one?

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Abigail Inkel, yet another victim of the Connecticut Baby Stealing Syndicate. Connecticut wants a franchise in your state.
.

Each audio link below is approx 3 minutes. Meredith Inkel describes Police, Prosecutorial, Judicial, and Police Misconduct in Connecticut. Imagine Police pushing their way into your house throwing you up against a wall arresting you and trying to find any excuse to bust you and take your kids away for processing and/or take away to make up for a State's budget deficit that is so large due to corruption, that officials need to abuse you to defraud Federal Taxpayers?

In America, if you're married, have children, and whether or not you've turned in an official for misconduct you can face arbitrary arrests, prison, and your children can be randomly officially kidnapped, adopted out, and harmed by DCF and others to defraud the rest of the US out of Federal Tax Dollars. Other states have looked to Connecticut to see what is the maximum Unconstitutional and Illegal abuse citizens will take. Please listen and be ready to be completely outraged.


this is an audio post - click to play Audio 1

.
.


this is an audio post - click to play Audio 2

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


State Official Child Abduction, can you imagine being with your spouse and meet you’re new bundle of joy comes into your life, and the Boys in Blue steal your baby and you don’t get a hearing for 4 years. What the “F”!!!???

Connecticut wants to kidnap your children and put you in jail to defraud federal taxpayers to make up for their over abundant corruption. What the “F”!!!???

Where’s the colorized Twilight Zone Episode on this one. What the “F”!!!???

Now that poorer Whites are getting “The Black Treatment” will somebody finally do something about this Civil Liberty, American Citizen and Family Abuse!!!???

(more Inkel Family photos below the fold, Phil Inkel and his family has been shot at by police, assaulted by police, police put a hit on Phil to kill Phil, and then they want to take away their children for federal tax fraud, racketeering, and Phil and Meredith can be locked up for years. This after a decade of Connecticut State Official Abuse. What the “F”!!!???)

Both Phil Inkel and his wife Meredith face more arrests and prison. They stand to lose all their children to adopted out, never to be seen again. You the Federal Taxpayer, are paying to break up the above family.

The policies as described above harm children, harm adults, harms families, harms the economy, and harms America.

I thought we lived in America, a Free and Fair Country.

Obviously not, as there is no one to report crimes to. The State of Connecticut says it is illegal to report Connecticut State Official Misconduct to Federal authorities. What!!!???

www.freespeech.com

http://starkravingviking.blogspot.com/

Connecticut's Steal Your Property, Wreck Your Life, Mafia

Barbara Johnson, Massachusetts Lawyer tells how Connecticut Judge, Jonathan Kaplan doesn't like her website, so he allegedly calls Massachusetts Judges to lodge complaints to get Barbara Johnson disbarred. What!!!??? The link to the 50 minute audio will more than educate you, you may laugh out loud, and be afraid, very afraid to end up in Connecticut Kangaroo Court.

Copwatch

Cops scan the horizon, not for criminals, but for anyone with a video camera. Rodney King would be an unknown, had it not been for a video camera. Had the LA Cops known they were being videoed, it would be taken as “evidence” and the evidence would be lost. There has to be protection for those who videotape as that is really the only evidence that will stick against a cop. If there were videos of White Cops shooting African Americans, execution style, Corruptikut’s Courts would not be able to pull a fast one to give racist cops a soft landing.
-Steven G. Erickson a.k.a. blogger Vikingas
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
OUTSIDE FEDERAL COURT in Hartford Friday, attorney Jon Schoenhorn, left, talks with client Francisco Acevedo Jr. They sought a restraining order allowing Acevedo to graduate after an incident in which he took video pictures of a police officer. (JOHN LONG) Jun. 16, 2006 Copyright 2006, Hartford Courant


CONNECTICUT NEWS
Student Is Charged In Camera Incident Seeks Court Order To Join Graduation
June 17, 2006 By LYNNE TUOHY, Courant Staff Writer

WEST HARTFORD -- It was a busy day at Conard High School Thursday, what with the release of scores of crickets in the cafeteria as a senior prank and the arrest of student council president Francisco Acevedo Jr., after he video-recorded what he said was excessive use of force by a police officer in the midst of the chaos.

Acevedo was suspended and faces the prospect of not being able to graduate with his classmates Wednesday or attend the school's post-graduation party. Acevedo, 18, and his attorney, Jon Schoenhorn, were in federal court Friday seeking a restraining order that would permit Acevedo to graduate. They also want a judge to order West Hartford police not to tamper with or destroy Acevedo's digital camera and memory card, which Officer James Parizo took from him at the school.

The case was assigned to U.S. District Judge Stefan R. Underhill, who was out of state Friday, but has scheduled a telephone conference with both sides Monday morning.Schoenhorn claims Acevedo's constitutional free speech rights were violated, and that the suspension was in retaliation for a school walkout by more than 100 students Acevedo led in May to protest proposed harsh immigration laws.

School officials told Acevedo he was being suspended for disrespect and insubordination because he challenged Vice Principal Irene Zytka's order that he put his camera away. Acevedo said he put the camera away, then told Zytka, "I have every right to record the police using force and it seemed like he was going to beat him up," according to the affidavit filed in federal court.

"It makes me mad," Acevedo said Friday.

"I spent four years at that high school working my butt off. I'm the school president. I lead a walkout, and they take it all out on me at the last minute."

West Hartford Police Chief James Stillacci said he could not discuss the case because the other student arrested - the one Acevedo said was the target of excessive force by Parizo - is 17.

Under the state's new youthful offender law, the identities of those ages 16 and 17 who are arrested are concealed until a decision is made on whether they are granted youthful offender status, which means the case and its proceedings remain confidential. Even though Acevedo is 18, he shares the police incident report with the 17-year-old, and the police and court reports are sealed.

"I have read the report, and there's another side of the story," Strillacci said.

The chief did say the camera and memory card were safely stored in the evidence vault. He would not permit a reporter to view the video, saying, "It's part of the case file."

Strillacci said Parizo was back at work Friday as the high school's resource officer, a job he has held for about 18 months

Acevedo was charged with breach of peace and interfering with a police officer. He and the other student were handcuffed at the school, taken to the police station in the back of a cruiser, fingerprinted and booked. Acevedo said he was in a cell for about two hours before being released."

Police do not have to take someone into custody for a misdemeanor," Schoenhorn said.

"In my opinion it was done in retribution for the videotaping."

Conard Principal A. Chuck Landroche and Zytka did not return phone calls seeking comment.

Landroche suspended Acevedo for five school days, which includes graduation day Wednesday.

Acevedo said he happened to have his digital camera, which can take brief video strands, in school Thursday because that was the last day of school for seniors. He said he was heading toward the cafeteria for lunch at about 11:35 a.m. when he saw crowds of students and learned about the cricket release. Acevedo said he took out his camera to take some pictures, and started using its video function. .

Acevedo said he focused on Parizo when he saw the officer, who was trying to make his way through the crowd, "shoving the kid around."

The 17-year-old was trying to push Parizo's hands away, Acevedo said.

Acevedo said it appeared Parizo was starting to pull his baton out of its holster. At that point, Acevedo said, he told Parizo: "I've got you on tape. I'm videotaping this and you're using force on this kid. Chill out."

At that point, Acevedo said, Zytka yelled at him to put away the camera.

Acevedo acknowledged that he raised his voice when he challenged Zytka, in part to make himself heard over the noisy scene.

"There was a bunch of crickets let out. Everyone was screaming. It was chaotic already," he said.

Acevedo accompanied Zytka to the office and Parizo brought the other student there. Zytka told Acevedo to leave the school, but Parizo arrested him instead, Acevedo said.

While Acevedo was waiting in the office, he reviewed a portion of his video. He said it depicts what he described, and that Zytka can be heard yelling at him to stop.

"I am concerned about whether this videotape is going to survive," Schoenhorn said.

In his complaint, Schoenhorn said Acevedo's arrest was a "ruse" by Parizo so the officer could seize the recording.

Schoenhorn also claims Acevedo's constitutional search and seizure rights were violated, because Parizo seized the camera without a warrant.

Schoenhorn said in his civil rights complaint that Acevedo would be irreparably harmed if he is not allowed to attend graduation as a result of constitutionally protected conduct.

"In particular, [Acevedo,] a high school senior summarily suspended for the remainder of his school career, claims that his rights were violated because he recorded with a camera misconduct on school grounds by a police officer, then asserted his right to do so, when told to cease his activities," the complaint reads.

* * * *
* * * *

“I’m with stupid”
Do you remember back when shirts said that with glitter irons-ons with a hand pointing one way or the other?

I was discussing a play about heaven and hell tonight, there is a play we couldn’t come up with the name of. If has 3 people unknowingly sentenced to hell, they hadn’t known they had died and couldn’t get out of a room with two people they absolutely couldn’t stand.

We drew parallels and wondered if we had done something wrong in a past life and got sentenced to Connecticut, just to live there and be with the overabundance of assholes.

I got banned from the “Connecticut” forum on MySpace.com that has about 5500 members for being the Connecticut anti-cheerleader. I posted audios and videos, with as few words as possible … you know me …

A reason why no one should even drive through Connecticut, and why America should be demanding things be cleaned up in Connecticut. The world could be a better place.

* * * *

Attorney Barbara Johnson a Massachusetts attorney serving a client from Maine in a Connecticut court, has a website , and it is anti-crooked, crappy, and thin skinned shit bag judges.

Laugh out loud as Barbara tells it like it is. 50 min interview, quick download

Judge Jonathan Kaplan allegedly didn’t like her website, http://www.falseallegations.com/ , that could be an indictment of his lack of character and fairness, so Judge Jonathan Kaplan allegedly called about 30 or so Judges in Massachusetts to get them to write letters to disbar Barbara.

Some Judges she had been in front for more than a decade. Kaplan is a shitbag, should be arrested, and should be properly judged and thrown in prison, in my opinion. Does Kaplan think of himself as a God and that he can do whatever he wants, when he wants. This is bad behavior of a spoiled child.

This judge is a criminal and should be locked up.

If a sack of shit judge will do that to an attorney that he just like what is on her website, image how you might do if you were in that Rockville Vernon Connecticut Courtroom that is run illegally, Unconstitutionally, and completely without morals.

This audio proves it.

* * * *

Ritt Goldstein Dec 1996 hearing on police brutality and law-breaking. The police union is like the mafia, says the Mayor of Norwalk

Jason Gebhardt- Falsely Accused of Shaken Baby Syndrome; not allowed a defense http://www.lifeundertheseas.com/jason/

Audiofile with parents June 13, 2006 Use Windows Media Player to play this telephone interview Prosecutor Dave Shannon, Judge Gary White, This is a must hear if you’re thinking of living or staying in Connecticut

DMR death threats
DMR’s Kristine Blake “Drop the (law) suit or you’re dead!” Fox 61 TV (stay tuned, it is in two parts)

Department of Mental Retardation’s and DMHAS’ Incompetence Leads to Deaths June 12, 2006 (NEW)

Erickson Interview Kristine Blake Audio June 6, 2006 (this tells how Connecticut operates in a nutshell)

Erickson Video Kristine Blake Video Interview June 6, 2006

Steve Murzin’s_"Homeland Security" murder attempt, stabbed 13 times (audio file)

Murzin 1994 TV Interview Beaten by Police, false arrest

Steve Murzin’s lawyer, F. Mac Buckley, speaks, Channel 8 newsclip, 1994

Steve Murzin speaks about being stabbed and the events at the hospital May 22, 2006 imagine being almost stabbed to death in a sneak attack and getting arrested when you wake up.

The perp that almost killed Murzin and stabbed two others got probation. I got a year in prison, 3 years probation for pepper spraying a mugger in my dark driveway. Judge Kaplan is shitbag, corrupt judge, I had tried to have him removed for bias in civil case BEFORE I was attacked on my property at night from behind. I’m the only one in the history of Connecticut as far as I know to get prison for Breach of Peace, and Assault 3rd, guilty or not.

What a jackass.

Colchester Police request Phil Inkel to be murdered TV Interview

Inkel (video) informs legislators about police shooting off their guns around his baby, and then stealing the data he was collecting for US Attorney John Durham

Inkel update Erickson Interview June 6, 2006

Inkel update Erickson June 7, 2006

Steve Erickson Interviews Meredith Inkel

Short Video Clip of Meredith Inkel (Winamp)

Inkel’s documents- 3 attempts to get the judge to sign an order based on no actual lab evidence- a falsified “Order of Custody"

Cathy Ellison, wife of policemen. Fun times with an out of control man , Cathy Ellison a cops’s exwife, Audio file interview Beatings, Stealing Dope and other goodies, like fireworks, from cars pulled over, DCF workers dancing on the tables at the bar with the cops, More from Debauchery, Party and Screw, Central- This sure explains a lot, as far as the DCF lying to the police all the time, each of them giving each other whatever they want. Cops can be too drunk and high to return cruisers for the next shift in Connecticut. Tax Dollars well spent, yeah right.

* * * *

This post is dedicated to Phil and Meredith Inkel, of East Haddam, Connecticut, formerly of Colchester, two parents that have endured constant official harassment, the illegal DCF kidnapping of their children, illegal gag orders, not being allowed a lawyer, not being allowed to dispute false allegations and witnesses, not allowed to call witnesses in their behalf, and face each going to prison, and the courts won’t even allow family members to take in the kids, they are to be ripped off and adopted out.

I really can’t believe all the shit Connecticut Authorities are getting away with. After a decade of abuse their lives and family might be permanently wrecked in a Connecticut court, Wednesday. Is that ok with you. Phil even tried to escape the Connecticut abuse, leaving to Alaska, Connecticut authorities falsely claimed that Phil Inkel was a felon capable of heinous acts and murder and was arrested in Alaska, when the authorities in Alaska learned that Connecticut is full of shit.

Sodom and Gomorra = Connecticut

Sunday, June 11, 2006

Hell, USA


Ritt Goldstein fled to seek political asylum in Sweden, so terrorized by police after making the above video. The video is from Dec. 1996, but this sort of abuse has only gotten worse since then. A special hearing was held in from the of the Legislative Judiciary Committee at the Hartford Capitol in Connecticut. Should citizens who inform elected officials about public corruption and police misconduct fear for their lives?


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Ritt Goldstein fled to Sweden sometime after this Connecticut Legislative hearing, seeking political asylum. [youtube video] shot before Richard "Ritt" Goldstein fled the US.
.
.
.
Ritt Goldstein Dec 1996 hearing on police brutality and law-breaking. The police union is like the mafia. (58 minute windows media player video file, approx 17.5 megabyte download, it is one of the most amazing and informative hours I have ever watched.)
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Colchester Connecticut Police Officers allegedly asked Vachon to murder Phil Inkel for $10,000 so the officers could avoid a police misconduct investigation.
.


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Phil Inkel claims Colchester Police Officer or Officers fired their pistols near him when he was riding his bicycle with his wife and infant(s). There are too many incidents of police abuse and misconduct to list. The Ritt Goldstein link will prove to all doubters that the problem is much worse than ever reported.
.
.
Phil Inkel informs State legislators (video, 5 megabytes) Is it ok for officers to shoot at an unarmed civilian couple with their infant on bicycles, to scare them out of making a police misconduct complaint?

Update Erickson Interview June 6, 2006 audio 10 to 15 min.

Update Erickson Interview June 7, 2006 audio 10 to 15 min.


Beyond a Bad State, Connecticut USA


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Murzin TV Interview Beaten by Police, false arrest

Steve Murzin's lawyer, F. Mac Buckley, speaks, Channel 8 newsclip, 1994 Attorney F. Mac Buckley nearly bursts into tears describing how one Murzin Boy cried out to the other and for police to stop beating his brother.

Steve Murzin talks about being stabbed and the events at the hospital May '06
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Ian allegedly had strangulation marks on his neck, there is speculation that Ian may have been snuffed out temporarily and then revived as Ian has never been the same since that fateful night in police custody.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

The former Mayor of Norwalk Connecticut claim police would go out on the rapage wearing ski masks, not identifying themselves, bringing citizens to be beaten and questioned in warehouses.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/europarl/Story/0,2763,510051,00.html (about Ritt)

http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0309-21.htm (by Ritt)

http://www.antiwar.com/ips/goldstein.php?articleid=3409 (by Ritt)







Kristine Blake “Drop the (law) suit or you’re dead!” Fox 61 TV (stay tuned, it is in two parts)

Erickson Interview Kristine Blake Audio June 6, 2006 (you'll be just amazed at what this daring woman has to say.)

Erickson Video Kristine Blake Interview June 6, 2006



Steve Murzin's_"Homeland Security" murder attempt, stabbed 13 times (audio file)

Murzin TV Interview Beaten by Police, false arrest

Colchester Police request Phil Inkel to be murdered TV Interview

Attorney Barbara Johnson (MA) speaks about abuse by DCF and Judicial Abuse Audio Interview, 50 minutes, 3 megabyte download
.
.
http://starkravingviking.blogspot.com/

www.freespeech.com
.
If you'd like the story and videos to go with the above, please email me at stevengerickson@yahoo.com

* * * *
added June 14, 2006, at 3:42 PM EST:




This baby is alive and well. Incident occurred when the baby was 6 months old.


Jason Gebhardt- Falsely Accused of Shaken Baby Syndrome; not allowed a defense http://www.lifeundertheseas.com/jason/


Audiofile with Parents, June 13, 2006 (listen to these parents talk about events, police, prosecutorial, and judicial misconduct, and ask yourself why you would even want to drive through Connecticut)

Use Windows Media Player to play this telephone interview Prosecutor Dave Shannon, Judge Gary White



Imagine being in your early 20’s, your girlfriend’s baby has difficulties, you dial 911, and then find yourself under arrest, as calling the authorities for help or assistance means if there is a possibility to arrest and process as many people, they will. And, it seems the common criminal parasites fall through the cracks, but the productive, average, taxpaying citizens can find themselves in the crosshairs of a State Government that has to make up for growth in a stagnant population and business pool, to defraud Federal Taxpayers to cover Connecticut Officials Cronies’ Padded Projects and the Bribes that are funneled back to the Officials.

It is the police, DCF, DMR, and other state agency unions that allows these officials to get more money to hire more officials to abuse more citizens.

Jason Gebhardt is sitting in a Connecticut prison to make up for a deficit. Jason did not rape anyone, didn’t rob anyone, didn’t try to kill anyone, did not murder anyone, Jason is accused of putting a child to roughly into a car seat. Like too many citizens police played their little tricks to make a crime out of a situation, lying, and trying to pressure impressionable, trusting citizens into making false statements that could lead to a maximum prosecution where none should have been taken up.

Listening to the Gebhardt parents describe the course of events that caused their son, Jason to be serving 12 years for doing nothing. Knowing what prison is like and what this young man is going through, in prison, innocent, with violent, mentally ill, disease riddled alcoholics and drug addicts is just plain wrong.

The Gebhardts put everything in prospective, especially towards the end.

This blogger's email: stevengerickson@yahoo.com

The SRV

Page 9 Crimes, a list of past interviews

* * * *

added June 25, 2006, 12:39 PM EST:

Crapulent Courts

Connecticut Supreme Court Chief Justice William Sullivan should face arrest for crimes against humanity. Treason is what the Connecticut Judiciary is up to and all of them should be punished accordingly. There is supposed to be separation of power between the 3 branches of government. Connecticut legislators, elected officials, are merely a puppet consortium and the people have a pretend ability to have access to their representatives. Connecticut is looking to abuse the average citizens, rip them off, process them, arrest them, incarcerate them, put them in a mental hospital all to defraud ALL Federal Taxpayers. Legislators and more of the people should try and grow a pair and not take this abuse anymore.


The Connecticut Commercial Elite feel they can rule the world from their Connecticut Castles. Many can trace their family trees to the Mayflower. Skull and Bones at Yale, other secret societies, and openly arrogant committees of jackasses abound. You are not safe anywhere in the US with this consortium of assholes running everything and ripping off everything and everyone they can.

DCF is the Secret Police, out doing anything they want, with an agenda of steal you blind, wreck your life, and punish those most severely that dare speak out and expose the abusers.

Connecticut is levying undeclared taxes. If the people have no say they are being taxed without representation. “Don’t Tread on Me”

Enough is enough, Sheeple, they have come for you, the train is at the station. Stand up, fight back.

If we were truly a Nation of Laws, the National Guard should be sent in and protect the people of Connecticut from the Abusive, Unconstitutional Crime Syndicate that has a hold on everybody’s everything. Stand up, Speak up, FIGHT BACK.

A DEMONSTRATION FOR JUSTICE is going to be held in front of the Connecticut Supreme Court in Hartford Connecticut, June 27, 2006.


Is a lame attorney angry with me for what I posted about him?

Open Letter to Chief Justice William J. Sullivan of Connecticut

Connecticut's Steal Your Property, Wreck Your Life, Mafia

Barbara Johnson, Massachusetts Lawyer tells how Connecticut Judge, Jonathan Kaplan doesn't like her website, so he allegedly calls Massachusetts Judges to lodge complaints to get Barbara Johnson disbarred. What!!!??? The link to the 50 minute audio will more than educate you, you may laugh out loud, and be afraid, very afraid to end up in Connecticut Kangaroo Court.

* * * *
* * * *

EDITORIALS (Hartford Courant)

Testify, Justice Sullivan
June 25, 2006

Judges are fond of saying that the only power they possess is the power of respect. One justice is undermining respect for the entire judiciary in Connecticut.

All three branches of state government have committees looking into court secrecy thanks to the reprehensible behavior of former Chief Justice William J. Sullivan. He furtively withheld publication of a controversial court ruling in April in hopes of getting a colleague promoted to the post he was vacating. He almost succeeded.

Now he's causing a constitutional collision between the judiciary and the only branch of government trying - in public, anyway - to hold him accountable for his misconduct.

Justice Sullivan is refusing to appear Tuesday at a hearing of the legislature's Judiciary Committee, whose members want to know more about the April incident.

Other justices have agreed to testify. But Justice Sullivan alone could explain such curious coincidences as how he knew who Gov. M. Jodi Rell would name to succeed him before the governor even knew, she says, that he was stepping down from the chief's job to senior justice status.

He is trying to evade the legislative hearing by asking a court to quash the subpoena requiring him to testify. In fact, on Friday, he even went so far as to ask a Superior Court judge in Waterbury to set the subpoena aside without a hearing. That's outrageous. The judge said no, as he should have.

Justice Sullivan should stop the evasive maneuvers and honor the subpoena. Two years ago, the state Supreme Court ruled that a legislative panel had the authority to subpoena a chief executive, Gov. John G. Rowland. Surely the rule is no different for a former chief justice.

But the judiciary would defend even an unworthy member to protect its independence. Acting Chief Justice David M. Borden has filed a motion to intervene in the battle on Justice Sullivan's behalf - even though Justice Borden is voluntarily testifying before the same committee and is championing court openness.

If Justice Sullivan refuses to obey the subpoena, the legislature has solid grounds to begin an impeachment inquiry. An inquiry could give Connecticut's halls of justice a good airing.

In 2002, two years after Justice Sullivan became chief justice, reporters found that the courts had sealed thousands of cases involving prominent and powerful people, including University of Connecticut President Philip Austin and Gov. John G. Rowland. Some cases were "super-sealed": Court workers weren't allowed to say the cases existed. Even the reasons for the sealings were sealed.

Then came Chief Justice Sullivan's secret hold this spring on a decision bound to alarm advocates of open government and hurt his protege, Justice Peter T. Zarella: the 4-3 ruling that computerized criminal and motor vehicle dockets were not subject to freedom of information laws.

These sub-rosa events have many people wondering, Who is policing judges? The answer should be the judges' own Judicial Review Council. But the council is itself shrouded in secrecy. By statute, it doesn't have to say whether it's investigating Justice Sullivan's obvious violation of judicial ethics.

What an irony if this jurist never comes to justice for concealing critical information, disregarding the Code of Judicial Conduct and eroding the public's trust in the courts.

* * * *
* * * *

The SRV

* * * *
* * * *

SOS From A Hell Cast By Probate



Rick Green

May 23 2006

A few weeks ago Daniel Gross passed a hastily scrawled note to a visitor.

"I am being incarcerated against my will and I need a good lawyer to represent me," Gross wrote in the uneasy script of an 86-year-old man slowly slipping away.

In another illustration of our renegade probate court system, Gross - a New York state resident - has been locked in a dismal Waterbury nursing home since last September.

Dan Gross' money and freedom have been snatched from him. Outside visitors and calls, even from family, are blocked. At times he is heavily medicated, according to his daughter and his own court affidavit.

Is it too much to ask of our probate courts that Gross be allowed to live his last days with a shred of self-respect?

Probate court Judge Thomas P. Brunnock - whose jurisdiction consists of Waterbury, Middlebury and Wolcott - has ordered this retired oil burner repairman from Long Island held against his will since September.

Gross didn't even know about the hearing at which a couple of local lawyers were handed control of his life.

While visiting his daughter Dee King last summer, Gross became ill and ended up in Waterbury Hospital. As his health deteriorated and Dee and her sister bickered, the hospital and family turned to the probate court. Big mistake.

The man appointed by the court to represent Gross, Jonathan Newman, argued against Gross' wishes in urging that a conservator be named to take control of his finances.

"Daniel Gross could benefit from a conservator of his estate and person due to his physical and mental deficiencies," Newman told the court.

It's hard to see how Gross has collected any benefit, drugged and locked in the Grove Manor nursing home. Perhaps Newman overlooked the court system's own standards.

"The attorney is to represent the client zealously," the rules state, "vigorously supporting the course of action chosen by the client."

Dan Gross' wish is to live in New York.

"It's a horrendous situation. It's taking away his rights and everything else," said Norman Grossman, a Levittown, N.Y., neighbor who has gone to state court in New York to try to force the tiny Waterbury probate court to release his friend.

In order to pay the $165 per hour lawyer bills that have piled up, Gross' savings of nearly $20,000 have been emptied.

His Levittown, Long Island, home recently was ordered sold to pay more of Newman's bills and those of Kathleen Donovan, the Naugatuck lawyer appointed as conservator for Gross.

Daniel Gross went to Levittown in 1946 and the young vet built a life. With his wife, he raised three kids and paid off a home on Sparrow Lane where Gross thought he'd live out his days.

His wife died a decade ago. The Sparrow Lane house fell into disrepair. The kids drifted apart, with his daughter Dee picking up most of the burden.

"I've been the person his entire life who has helped him. I've always made sure he is safe and secure," King told me.

"He wants to stay in New York. My father had a life. He walked. He talked. Then they take him and lock him up like an animal."

Daniel Gross sure does need a good lawyer, one willing to take on a shameful probate court where paying the bills of lawyers looms more significant than the dignity of a man at the end of his life.

Rick Green's column appears on Tuesdays and Fridays. He can be reached at rgreen@courant.com
Copyright 2006, Hartford Courant

* * * *
* * * *

From: "Paul Trambarulo" Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 04:37:24 GMT
To: stevengerickson@yahoo.com
CC: syringa12@aol.com, brianwpincin@juno.com, pegtracy123@aol.com
Subject: Re: Connecticut Probate Court is robbing my family!

Hi Steve,

No I haven't contacted you before but my sister Anne Haines may have. Our 75 year old mother is trapped in CT under the CORRUPT CT Probate Court system. I have attached a document that my sister wrote which explains the whole situation. We have tried the traditional legal channels but they have been hardly effective and have simply resulted in draining my parents funds (something the probate system is supposed to PRESERVE. what a joke). Please feel free to send this information to anyone and everyone. I can be reached at [phone number snipped] until noon Eastern time or you can leave me a message on my cell @ [phone number snipped]. You can also reach Anne @ [phone number snipped].

Thanks in advance for ANY help you can offer us.

Sincerely,

Paul T. Trambarulo and family

-- Steven Erickson wrote:


For some reason, I'm getting a lot of responses lately.

Have we talked before, and please tell me more,
-Steve

Paul Trambarulo wrote:
Hi Steve,
Any thoughts on how to get my mother (NOT a CT resident) out of the jaws of the greedy, probate court system? I will send you more info if you think you can help me broadcast this corruption.
Thanks,
Paul Trambarulo

[below attached to email]




“Don’t Die in Connecticut, and Don’t be Judged Incompetent There Either!”

A great travesty of justice is occurring in Connecticut, fostered by a corrupt probate court system which feeds on the estates of those unfortunate enough to fall into its clutches. Although most cases which come before the probate court are concerned with wills and the wishes of the deceased, probate courts are also given jurisdiction over the lives of those who are judged no longer competent to make important decisions for themselves.

This jurisdiction is being used to make judgments which are clearly NOT in the best interests of Maydelle Trambarulo, ward of the court, and her family. We, her family, wish to protest the decision made by Judge Clifford Hoyle, acting Judge for Woodbridge Probate Court, as neither impartial nor fair. We plan to appeal his verdict to a higher Court, but we also feel that Judge Hoyle’s conduct of this case should be investigated on both legal and moral grounds. He brings great discredit to the Probate Court system of CT in both his handling of this case and the decision he rendered. His conduct, as well as the conduct of Mark DellaValle, “independent” conservator of Mrs. Trambarulo, Paul Whittaker, court appointed attorney for Mrs. Trambarulo, and Robyn Berke, court appointed guardian ad litem, has been a disgrace to the legal profession.

Why is this happening? Professor John Langbein, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School, recently testified before the Connecticut legislature during their review and investigation of Connecticut’s probate court system. According to Professor Langbein, people should “try not to die in Connecticut”, as Connecticut has long been considered a “poster child for how not to organize probate courts.” To further quote Professor Langbein,

“The perverse financial incentives that pervade our probate system are a disgrace. Goal Number One of probate reform in Connecticut should be to sever the link between court proceedings and profit. Any system of judicial procedure that compensates judges or court officers for stirring up more work is wrong. … Our corrupt system of franchise-style probate courts has given the judges a powerful vested interest in preventing reforms that would lower costs and speed probate procedure.”

(“The Scandal of Connecticut’s Probate Courts”, Testimony to CT Legislature Committee on Program Review and Investigation, Hartford, CT, Oct. 7, 2005)

Our family has experienced this self-serving system first hand, containing an insidious corruption of cronyism and greed, in this case being used to the utmost by someone who knows how to manipulate the system for her own perfidious ends.

Background

The case was brought before the Probate Court of Woodbridge CT by Ms Teresa Sirico of New Haven on behalf of our wife and mother, Maydelle Trambarulo, without our knowledge or consent. Ms. Sirico brought Mrs. Trambarulo to CT for rehabilitative therapy for a broken hip. Ms Sirico, who is the niece of Maydelle’s husband Ralph Trambarulo, told us that she wished to bring Maydelle to a “top-notch facility affiliated with Yale University, for a period of 30-60 days”, and then would return her to her home in Delaware. Why did we agree? We trusted Ms Sirico as a family member, believing her to be acting in Maydelle’s best interests, never dreaming of the nightmare which would follow. Maydelle was essentially kidnapped, as she NEVER intended to make Connecticut her permanent residence. We testified in probate court hearings that Ms Sirico lied to us about this and other matters, but our testimony was ignored. We also contested the court’s jurisdiction in this case, based on the grounds that Mrs. Trambarulo does not have domicile in the state of CT, but Judge Hoyle based his decision on her residency in CT, a residency that was obtained through the deceitful words and actions of Ms. Sirico.

Ms Sirico, a real estate broker in the New Haven area, targets the elderly in marketing her business, and also touts herself as a champion of the elderly, as she has endowed a foundation at SCSU for issues affecting the elderly. She knows the laws and procedures regarding conservatorship quite well, since she was involved in a similar prior case (DeVita vs. Sirico, 29 CLR 449 (2001, 2002, 2003)). The facts in this case are eerily familiar. We brought this case to the attention of the court, but again, our testimony was totally ignored. We believe Ms. Sirico is a ruthless SERIAL family destroyer, aided and abetted by a court system she knows very well and manipulates for her own twisted purposes. Her outrageous behavior and blatant disregard for the truth has been demonstrated in prior cases.(DeVita vs Sirico, 29 CLR 449 (2001)) She will continue to victimize others unless she is stopped.

We received paperwork from the Woodbridge court in October 2004 advising us of Ms Sirico’s ex parte application for temporary conservatorship of Maydelle’s person and estate after Ms Sirico first had Maydelle declared incompetent using her Power of Attorney. Ms Sirico claimed that Maydelle’s financial affairs were “in disarray”, which WAS NOT TRUE. We disputed her application, and attended a hearing in Woodbridge CT in November 2004, before Judge Robert Horowitz. Peter Barrett, our attorney at the time, advised us that the appointment of an independent conservator was probably the wisest course, as none of us lives in CT. We agreed, envisioning a neutral party whom we could work with. Attorney Mark DellaValle was appointed by the court as conservator of both Maydelle’s person and estate. The court also appointed Paul Whittaker as Maydelle’s attorney and Robyn Berke as guardian ad litem.(GAL). Judge Clifford Hoyle replaced Judge Horowitz as acting Judge of Woodbridge Probate Court in January 2005.

Our goal then and now was to reunite Maydelle with her husband and family while ensuring high quality medical care for her. Ralph had moved from Delaware back to New Jersey (where he and Maydelle lived for 48 years prior to their move to Delaware in 2003) to live near Anne, their eldest daughter. Daughter Margaret also lives in New Jersey. We asked Mr. DellaValle to consider moving Maydelle back to New Jersey, which he refused to do. In February, 2005, Maydelle nearly died of an infection she contracted while a resident at The Willows-Harborside facility in Woodbridge, CT (the facility she was taken to by Ms Sirico), and was later moved to Birmingham Health Care Center in Derby, CT, where she presently resides. We presented a motion to reunite Maydelle with her family to the court in May 2005. Hearings were held in June 2005 in which members of Maydelle’s family were subjected to interrogation more appropriate to a criminal trial. It should be noted that attorneys Della Valle, Whittaker and Berke have always been adversarial to us and sympathetic to Ms Sirico. We hoped that Judge Hoyle would consider the testimony we presented to the court concerning Ms Sirico’s activities and her manipulative and deceitful behavior. Once again, our testimony was totally ignored by the court.

In November, our attorney, John Berman presented a motion disputing the Court’s jurisdiction over the case, based on the fact that Maydelle is not presently (and never has been) domiciled in CT. Ms Sirico presented motions applying for co-conservatorship and an “emergency” motion to move Mrs Trambarulo to an assisted living facility closer to her. These motions were denied by the court. We then waited 3 months for Judge Hoyle’s decision. We had previously waited 4 months for a decision on the earlier motion, and when no decision was forthcoming, asked that the decision be delayed until the jurisdictional motion was ruled upon. (Ironically, the following quote is from a recent article on probate court reform, “Woodbridge acting Probate Judge, Clifford Hoyle, advocated the present system, saying, "In a contested case, it doesn't take years." The Orange Bulletin, 02/02/2006

We will address the following charges:

1.Outrageous statements without proof:
In his judgment (dated January 12, 2006, but not received by the court until February 21), Judge Hoyle made many statements which we strongly dispute. He stated that we “seem to be indifferent to her care”. This is absolutely outrageous!!! First and most importantly, we love Maydelle, our wife and mother, and care very deeply and sincerely about her welfare. We are not “indifferent to her care”, but have been shut out of the day-to-day decision-making and information by both the conservator and our physical separation from CT. We are being penalized by the court for having spouses, families and jobs.

2. Discrimination based on age and medical infirmities:
Judge Hoyle dismissed Mrs. Trambarulo’s husband Ralph as “elderly, infirm and … has been unable to care for himself for some time.” Judge Hoyle never acknowledges that her husband’s circumstances and residence have also changed, and that he now has a live-in aide in his own home. Again, Judge Hoyle ignored testimony we presented regarding Ralph’s medical conditions. Judge Hoyle’s statement also displays callous disregard for the rights of this couple to pass their remaining years together. Ralph is being discriminated against on the basis of his age, as he is not able to speak for himself as vigorously as he would if he was younger. Ralph is no longer able to travel to CT to see his wife. Although he realizes they can no longer reside together due to her health issues, he very much wishes to be able to see his WIFE OF 50 YEARS on a daily basis.

The court in its decision is taking advantage of his age and infirmities to deprive him of his constitutional right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”, namely the companionship of his wife of 50 years. Maydelle is also certainly being deprived of the same rights, as she has stated to us many times that “I just don’t care whether I live or die anymore.” This is certainly not the happy picture painted by Ms Sirico and Judge Hoyle! Again, it is an OUTRAGE that ANY court should keep a husband and wife apart for the reasons given by Judge Hoyle! Their 50th Wedding Anniversary, December 26, 2005, should have been a joyous occasion for family and friends to celebrate, but instead brought us sadness at their separation.

3. Conflicts of interest with the court and officers
This case displays a very obvious conflict of interest with the court and its officers. They are the ones who get to decide whether the source of their financial “gravy train” stays in CT or is allowed to leave the state! Clearly it is in THEIR best interests financially that Maydelle Trambarulo stay in Connecticut.

4. Denial of access to funds and information
Ralph has been denied access to his own money by Judge Hoyle. In order to purchase a residence he had to obtain a mortgage at age 80 because he could not access his own money in a joint Merrill Lynch account. We have made numerous requests to the court for information on how Maydelle’s money is being spent. We have NEVER received any answers.

5. Judge Hoyle’s decision based upon biased testimony and
inaccurate facts

Attorneys DellaValle, Whittaker and Berke have all voiced their opinions that Maydelle should stay in CT. Their opinions, with life-altering consequences, are based on their knowledge of Maydelle’s family as told to them by Ms Sirico, certainly NOT on any factual basis. These court officers are all on friendly terms with Ms Sirico and adversarial to Maydelle’s family, as evidenced by their questioning of us in the hearings. They do not know us, and most certainly have not tried to know us. Instead they have accepted the lies told them by Ms Sirico.

Judge Hoyle could not even get the FACTS of this case straight! As we have stated in numerous documents submitted to the court, Maydelle was a resident of Delaware at the time she was brought to CT, NOT New Jersey as stated by Judge Hoyle in his decision. This is a very significant error, as he then states throughout his decision that a “return” to New Jersey would return her to her prior circumstances. Maydelle would NOT be returning to her prior circumstances, but instead would reside in a health care facility with equivalent or better care than she is receiving at present. We presented information and testimony about a rehab facility in NJ which is directly across the street from where Ralph lives. We might add that the facility in NJ is also less expensive than the one in CT, by $18,000 per year! (Apparently, consideration of “what is best for Maydelle” depends upon keeping her a prisoner of the court in CT!) Instead of considering the information we presented, Judge Hoyle stated in his decision that

“The Court is not convinced that the respondent’s family is willing to make the time commitments necessary to care for her if she returned to NJ. When asked about the nursing home which was planned to become the respondent’s residence in New Jersey, her daughter who had selected the nursing home testified that she had never been inside the building.”

Once again, we are penalized by the court for having families and jobs. At the time of the hearing, the daughter (Anne) was extremely busy at work, and her husband John, Maydelle’s son-in-law, was going right by the facility. He offered to tour the facility and obtain information for his wife. Isn’t a loving and trusted SON-in-law of 20 years able to vouch for the facility as well as a blood relative? Ms. Sirico is not a blood relative, yet her word is accepted as gospel!
Why also does the Court overlook what seems so perfectly obvious to anyone else, that Ms Sirico may indeed have an ulterior motive (possibly financial, despite her protestations to the contrary) in keeping her aunt and uncle separated from each other?? Why does Ms Sirico display absolutely NO interest in her blood relative, her Uncle Ralph? Because she has no possibility of controlling either him or his finances!

When it suits the purposes of the court, Maydelle is considered competent in her opinions on where she would like to reside, but incompetent in other matters. The supposed goal of the court, “What is best for Maydelle”, (her future), is decided by the court’s officers on the basis of the few minutes they have spent with her and the answers she has provided to their questions. Those answers are a product of months of brainwashing and coaching by Ms Sirico and others, PROVEN by a paper we presented to the court which was written by a friend of Ms Sirico. AGAIN, OUR EVIDENCE WAS IGNORED by the court. We, her family know her better than anyone else in the world, and have been totally disregarded by the court when we say that Maydelle is being brainwashed and unduly influenced by Ms Sirico’s abusive and domineering manner, as she continues to feed Maydelle lies about us, her family, on a daily basis. Ms Sirico succeeded in convincing Maydelle’s siblings (who have not seen her in 10 or more years, (only two of whom who have ever met Ms Sirico briefly)), that we are unfit to care for our wife and mother.

The Probate Court’s primary function in this case should be the reuniting of Maydelle with her FAMILY, and the true conservation of her person and financial estate, NOT the reallocation of her hard-earned assets to court officers’ own bank accounts! Judge Hoyle’s decision appears to be motivated not by an interest in what is truly best for our wife and mother, but self-serving GREED of the most reproachable kind. Naively, we once believed that justice was blind; sadly, we have found the justice rendered in the Probate Court of Judge Clifford Hoyle to be both deaf and dumb to our pleas and the evidence we presented.



Connecticut's Steal Your Property, Wreck Your Life, Mafia

* * * *

added July 6, 2006, 12:35 PM EST:



Date:

Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:19:19 -0700 (PDT)

From:

Send an Instant Message "Anne Trambarulo-Haines"
Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com.

Subject:

CT court system

To:

stevengerickson@yahoo.com

Hello,

I read with interest the messages you received from Paul Trambarulo about ohis mother. He is desperately trying to have her returned to NJ in order to regain control of the family money. None of the family has gainful employment enough to support any type of lifestyle and they have been using the parents' money to live on for many years.

In this case, there is good reason why she is in CT in the first place--he moved his parents from their long-time home in NJ (48 yrs) to Delaware, then basically abandoned them. His mother broke her hip and was totally bedridden and his father is senile. Nobody was caring for them. Ms. Sirico rescued Mrs. Trambarulo from sitting in her own waste starving to death. There is documentation of these conditions by social services. Paul and his siblings are not facing charges of elder abuse, abandonment, and exploitation because they live in Delaware (or wherever they are now) and can't be tried in another state.

You will have to trust that I am in a position to know these facts and much more. This will have to be kept anonymous since Paul and his lover Brian have made threats of bodily harm and even death to anyone they think is not on their side. They are psychologically unstable.

I just wanted to let you know so you would not spend any time and energy on a case which has no merit. The story he told you is full of lies, errors, and omissions.

You've heard the saying, "you've made your bed, now you have to sleep in it". That's where Paul and co. are now.

Have a nice day,





Added July 13, 2006, The Response:



From: "brianwpincin@juno.com" Add to Address BookAdd to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 03:58:49 GMT
To: stevengerickson@yahoo.com
CC: lighthouseaw@aol.com, PEGTRACY123@aol.com, syringa12@aol.com, paultram@juno.com, brianwpincin@juno.com, princessmelany@hotmail.com
Subject: Blog written regarding the CT Probate Court- Tramabrulo / Sirico

Please if you would post my reply to the outrageous post wrtitten on your site. Please see post, then my reply. Much Thanks. Brian W. Pincin.

Original Post:

Date:


Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:19:19 -0700 (PDT)

From:


Send an Instant Message "Anne Trambarulo-Haines"
Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com.

Subject:


CT court system

To:


stevengerickson@yahoo.com



Hello,

I read with interest the messages you received from Paul Trambarulo about ohis mother. He is desperately trying to have her returned to NJ in order to regain control of the family money. None of the family has gainful employment enough to support any type of lifestyle and they have been using the parents' money to live on for many years.

In this case, there is good reason why she is in CT in the first place--he moved his parents from their long-time home in NJ (48 yrs) to Delaware, then basically abandoned them. His mother broke her hip and was totally bedridden and his father is senile. Nobody was caring for them. Ms. Sirico rescued Mrs. Trambarulo from sitting in her own waste starving to death. There is documentation of these conditions by social services. Paul and his siblings are not facing charges of elder abuse, abandonment, and exploitation because they live in Delaware (or wherever they are now) and can't be tried in another state.

You will have to trust that I am in a position to know these facts and much more. This will have to be kept anonymous since Paul and his lover Brian have made threats of bodily harm and even death to anyone they think is not on their side. They are psychologically unstable.

I just wanted to let you know so you would not spend any time and energy on a case which has no merit. The story he told you is full of lies, errors, and omissions.

You've heard the saying, "you've made your bed, now you have to sleep in it". That's where Paul and co. are now.
Have a nice day,

My reply to be posted please:


Trambarulo Family, Teresa Sirico, and the CT Probate Courts-



I read a response left "unbodly" and anonymously by someone regarding the Trambarulo Family, Teresa Sirico, and the CT Probate Courts. First the person who wrote this is an extreme coward for not verifying who they are. The entire post is full of malicious statements and lies. If this statement was not written by Ms. Sirico herself, I'm confident that it is someone who she has put up to writing it. The complete post is full of lies and accusations. First, no one is trying to gain control of anyone's money. The CT state probate court has left he husband of Maydelle Trambarulo with no money, frozen accounts, and separated from his wife of 50 years. No regard by the courts or parties to be ever support the spouse in this case, rather keep the war Maydelle Trambarulo in a nursing home away from her children and spouse of 50 years. As far as the statement made that none of the family has gainful employment is an outrageous lie. All of the family including myself is gainfully employed. The source that wrote this is very misguided. None of the children have ever stolen anything from their parents, but have received gifts over the years. Fortunately at the time in the parents lives (Ralph and Maydelle Trambarulo) - they were secure enough to be able to provide gifts at times to their children. Luckily they did, as the CT courts are eating away all of the Tramabrulo's hard earned funds at present. Paul Trambarulo did not move his parent's to DE to take their money. It was a family decision to move the parent's to Delaware, as their home in Red Bank New Jersey was much too much for them to handle. The move was also agreed upon by both Ralph and Maydelle Trambarulo. The parent's were cared for in their home in DE, and the son had provided proper medical care to both parent's when needed. There are NO reports as previously stated in the written blog "anonymously" of any elder abuse as accused. The person who wrote this is simply out to keep the fight to keep the ward "Maydelle Tramabrulo" in CT for their own financial purposes. The most outrageous statement made that Paul and Brian have threatened death to people not on their side is absolutely incredible and most untrue. I almost laughed reading that statement myself. If Paul Trambarulo or Brian Pincin did such an outrageous act, then why didn't the supposed "threatened" person press charges of threat for such a devious act? The blog I copied in my response below is nothing more than a devious act to keep the CT court ball rolling, and to attempt to discredit the family of Maydelle Trambarulo. The person who wrote the below blog is a coward, liar, and is more to be pitied than laughed at or given anger.



Most Sincerely,

Brian W. Pincin

Brian W. Pincin
brianwpincin@juno.com



This post accepts anonymous comments. Click on white envelope to share this post.

Friday, June 09, 2006

The Connecticut State Police Omerta Crumbling?




Arthur L. Spada, former Connecticut State Police Commissioner

CONNECTICUT NEWS
Witness Reveals `Secret' Meeting Says Session Involved Public Safety Chief, Father Of Slain Man

June 9, 2006 By TRACY GORDON FOX And ALAINE GRIFFIN, Courant Staff Writers

MERIDEN -- A former state police commissioner went behind the backs of detectives feverishly tracking leads in the 2003 mob-style killing of a Middletown businessman, holding a "secret meeting" with the victim's father and attorney, according to testimony in the larceny trial of former state police Maj. Greg Senick.

Timothy Barry, a former commander and colonel of the state police, made the accusations against his former boss, Public Safety Commissioner Arthur Spada, during testimony Wednesday in Senick's trial in Superior Court in Meriden. The trial has become a fish bowl of the dysfunctional state police hierarchy during Spada's tenure, which ended in 2004.

Through his pointed cross-examinations, Senick's attorney, James Wade, has tried to show that Senick's arrest was fueled by politics from outside and within the department. Under Wade's questioning, Barry, a prosecution witness, disclosed the meeting Spada and Senick held in 2003 concerning one of Middletown's most notorious unsolved homicides, the slaying of Joseph Mazzotta.

It was "a secret meeting that was completely undisclosed and undocumented and after that, Mr. Wade, I told your client if he ever did anything like that again I would run him right out of the state police," Barry said.

"And I told him, don't ever do that again. If that ever occurs where the commissioner is going to do something unethical as that, you have to tell me about that," said Barry, who now works in fraud management for a Hartford insurance company.

Senick, who is accused of charging thousands of dollars in bills to the state while living in state-owned property, had been Spada's chief of staff.

Reached at home Thursday, Spada, a former Superior Court judge, acknowledged meeting with Salvatore Mazzotta, the father of Joseph Mazzotta, who had been shot in the face and neck at point-blank range in Middletown. But he vehemently denied there was anything secretive or unethical about it and said that Barry was bitter and out to get him because he drummed Barry out of the department, after he learned Barry was trying to get his job.

"It's an outrage. It's the mad ranting of a disturbed and paranoid mind," Spada said of Barry, whom he had appointed colonel.

"It was the worst appointment I ever made, and I regret it."

Spada said he frequently met with citizens who wrote to him about cases or problems.

"Mr. Mazzotta is a citizen. He lost a son in a very gruesome killing," he said.

"I conducted hundreds of these sessions when I had a complaint."

Spada said the meeting was held in the library of his office and that state police attorney Dawn Hellier was there.

"It was on the calendar," he said.

Spada said Mazzotta had asked the state police to take over the investigation of his son's death from Middletown police. He said the major crime unit had already completed its investigation and had turned over any evidence to Middletown detectives.

But according to Barry and other sources, the state police Statewide Narcotics Task Force and Organized Crime Task Force were still involved when that meeting took place.

Friends found Mazzotta's body in the offices of the family's equipment-rental business on Boston Road in Middletown on April 14, 2003. Police never determined a motive for the killing.

Mazzotta, 40, was a member of one of Middletown's wealthiest families, prominent in local construction and real estate.

Investigators have examined the family's investments in the Schaghticoke Indian tribe in Kent and Joseph Mazzotta's involvement in Cocktails on the Green, the Cromwell bar in which Mazzotta had a silent interest. The bar was in financial trouble, and police sources said low-level transactions of narcotics and stolen goods took place there. Before his son was killed, Salvatore Mazzotta had hired bodyguards to keep order at the bar. He also paid tens of thousands of dollars to settle the bar's debts so it could be sold.

About a month before the slaying, a severed pig's head was left at the bar's front stoop.

In December 2003, Middletown investigators went to Springfield, Mass., looking for possible connections between Mazzotta's slaying and the Nov. 23, 2003, killing of Adolfo "Big Al" Bruno, a reputed mobster for the New York-based Genovese crime family.

Bruno attended Mazzotta's wake and funeral and is known to have associated with Salvatore Mazzotta, sources close to the investigation have said. Last December, Frankie Roche, a Massachusetts man with reputed mob ties, was charged with murder in Bruno's death.

Salvatore Mazzotta had been meeting regularly with Middletown police for updates, police sources said, but the meetings are now less frequent. Sources have said Mazzotta's involvement has been awkward at times, partially because in 1990, Salvatore Mazzotta was charged and later acquitted in a cocaine-trafficking case.

On Thursday, Mazzotta recalled meeting with state police after his son was killed, but he could not remember meeting with Spada. He said a stroke he had four months ago has affected his memory.

Mazzotta said his greatest frustration has been police officers' insistence that he knows more about this than he is saying.

"Instead of looking for who killed my son, they were looking at me," Mazzotta said about Middletown detectives.

"They go to Springfield, they follow me. I'd be a damn fool if I know who did it and don't tell."

Mazzotta, who had asked for state police help days after the slaying, said he lacked confidence Middletown police could find his son's killer and was disheartened when state police pulled out of the case just months after the slaying. He said no one has contacted him about the investigation in 2½ years.

"They left me hanging. I don't know nothing," Mazzotta said.

"I don't have faith in nobody no more. I lost a son."

Middletown Deputy Police Chief Lynn Baldoni declined to comment on the investigation Thursday.

Spada's name had come up at a March 4, 2004, meeting between state police investigators, Drug Enforcement Administration officials and officers from the Statewide Narcotics Task Force.

At that meeting, state police Capt. Peter Terenzi, then head of the narcotics task force, voiced concern about Spada's involvement in the Mazzotta case

In a report, Terenzi said that Spada had friends and associates in the area who "were also some of the people we were looking at as possible or potential targets."

Terenzi was later transferred and disciplined after allegations surfaced that he disparaged Spada's familiarity with Italians.

In his testimony, Barry said Senick was "obligated" to disclose the 2003 meeting with Mazzotta, which occurred "while an investigation is going out and dozens of officers are trying to solve the case."

"You know, Mr. Wade, as a criminal defense attorney the consequences of actions like that," Barry said, referring to how the meeting may have affected the case.

* * * *

Is Arthur L. Spada the kingpin of a crime syndicate, The Connecticut State Police?

A letter sent to Connecticut State Police Commissioner Leonard C. Boyle

My email into CPS Loads of links.

The Grand Maul, Official, Police, Judge Post to Eat Sh*t and go F themselves Letter:


The Steven G. Erickson Mugshot

This post accepts anonymous comments. Click on white envelope to share this post.

This blogger's email: stevengerickson@yahoo.com

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

The 411 on Officials Completely Abusing and Intimidating Their Own

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.



.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

June 6, 2006, re Kristine Blake: "This is a very disturbing story, but what's even more disturbing, is that this is across the board how the State operates." -- Steve Erickson

The harassment of CT State Employee Kristine Blake: Fox 61 TV Video (stay tuned, it is in two parts)

Erickson Interview Kristine Blake Audio June 6, 2006

Erickson Video Kristine Blake Interview June 6, 2006

Kristine Blake- false police report for "improper contact" after filed a complaint of Department of Mental Retardation Employee abuse of a DMR client. Marlene Fein was allegedly the DMR supervisor in charge of harassment, Manchester Police filed Detective Renee Ferron

Sgt Chris Davis, wanted Kristine to take a lie detector test- advised not to comply with polygraph through police because they are rigged.

Captain of Manchester Police called her a "bitch." If she any needed assistance from the Police, she would need to seek this assistance through a lawyer. Manchester Police complicit in false police complaints.

"Code of Silence: Whistleblowers are nailed... The victim always becomes the criminal. DMR will harass you until you can't work any more."-- Kristine Blake.

* * * *

The above case is the best proof that Connecticut is being run in a bad way from the top down. The system has not been corrected and the abuse only continues to get worse. Connecticut is definitely the “State of Fear”. When will it end, when will an official or agency step in and state acting for the US Constitution and start upholding the law?

The Manchester Connecticut Police refused to take statements of citizens that supported Kristine Blake’s allegations and would not take complaints regarding those making false statements to police according to Kristine Blake. As far as we know, no one was punished for illegal, Unconstitutional, and for official misconduct, no arrests, no discipline, no firings. That is crap. Furthermore, authorities that are supposed to protect citizens coerced Kristine Blake into signing that she would not pursue official criminals for crimes committed. What!!!???


A post with links to more interviews, click

The SRV

* * * *
* * * *
added 11:59 AM EST June 9, 2006:

CONNECTICUT NEWS
Appeals Ruling Faults DCF Says Agency Failed To Give Girl Care Ordered By Court
June 9, 2006 By COLIN POITRAS, Hartford Courant Staff Writer

The state Department of Children and Families' repeated failure to provide court-ordered psychiatric care for a troubled girl who had been removed from her family has brought a rebuke from one of the state's highest courts.

DCF officials Thursday protested the Appellate Court's decision to uphold a lower court contempt citation, saying they tried their best to provide services for the child referred to in court documents as Leah S. They are considering an appeal.

But agency watchdogs said the ruling exposes the shortfalls that continue to plague the state child welfare system and place hundreds of children at risk.

"This decision is one more indication that the most consistently negligent `parent' in Connecticut is the Department of Children and Families," said Richard Wexler, executive director of the Virginia-based National Coalition for Child Protection Reform.

"Leah was a troubled child when the Department of Children and Families took responsibility for her care," Wexler said.

"After bouncing her from foster home to foster home and offering no help to her or her family, Leah almost certainly is a lot more troubled now."

In a nine-page decision released late Wednesday, the Appellate Court found that Superior Court Judge Thayer Baldwin Jr. in Middletown was justified in citing DCF for contempt in September 2004 for failure to comply with three separate court orders to take care of Leah's "unmistakable and urgent" psychiatric needs. Baldwin also ordered DCF to pay Leah's mother, who sought the contempt citation, $500 in attorney fees.

Leah was taken from her parents on April 9, 2003, after DCF social workers convinced a judge that her parents were unable to care for her. A subsequent mental health evaluation showed Leah had chronic depression, bipolar disorder, attention adjustment disorder and other behavioral problems.

Leah's violent and aggressive behavior, coupled with suicidal and homicidal thoughts and daily migraine headaches, caused problems for the foster families, case records show. During her various stays in foster homes, Leah reportedly tried to hurt a family cat and was arrested for assaulting a 2-year-old foster sister. At one point, one of Leah's foster mothers was forced to sleep in a hallway because she feared Leah would hurt her children, the ruling said.

Although DCF's own workers recommended that Leah be placed as soon as possible in a therapeutic group home or residential treatment center where she could receive intensive counseling and care, the agency instead bounced Leah around four different non-therapeutic foster homes for seven months where she suffered the possible effects of overmedication and where her psychiatric condition deteriorated, the ruling said.

Appellate Judge Thomas A. Bishop, who wrote the decision, called the case facts "troubling."

"While Leah was in foster care, the department failed to provide her with mental health treatment, failed to provide her foster parents with adequate support, failed to provide her parents with counseling classes designed to educate them on how to raise children with mental health issues and made no effort to facilitate counseling between Leah and her brother," Bishop wrote.

The Appellate Court dismissed DCF's contention that the court's expectations of the agency were vague and unclear and, as a result, the agency could not be held in contempt. Bishop said DCF was intimately familiar with Leah's needs and failed to provide the same kind of mental health care it had accused Leah's mother of failing to provide when the agency took Leah. The ruling "highlights the importance of appropriate mental health treatment for children with specialized needs," said Susan B. Carr, the Waterford attorney who represented Leah's mother.

Carr said Leah's removal from her family hurt both. DCF spokesman Gary Kleeblatt said the agency has changed greatly since 2003 when Leah first entered foster care.Kleeblatt referred to a federal court monitor's assessment of the agency released Thursday that showed DCF has made significant gains in conducting mandatory mental health assessments of abused and neglected children, meeting case load standards and in reducing repeated incidents of neglect and abuse in families already known to the system.The monitor's report showed DCF has met 15 out of 22 court-set performance goals, the agency's best showing since the monitor began evaluating the goals two years ago.

The DCF needs to meet all 22 goals to be removed from federal court oversight. A federal judge started supervising DCF's performance 15 years ago after Connecticut child advocates sued the department for failing to adequately help thousands of children in its care.

"The work in this case dates back three years. We believe there is solid proof that our practice has improved since then and there are many more resources available in terms of service," Kleeblatt said.

But attorney Martha Stone - one of the lawyers who brought the lawsuit that placed DCF under federal oversight - said Leah's case illustrates the serious failures that continue to undermine Connecticut's child welfare system despite its recent successes in other areas.

"The bouncing of kids with serious mental health issues from one non-therapeutic foster home to another was evident in 2003, and sadly is still occurring in 2006," said Stone, now executive director of the Hartford-based Center for Children's Advocacy.

"This case sends a clear message to DCF...that merely giving a child a roof overhead is not enough."

Federal monitor Raymond Mancuso in his latest report said DCF, despite its improvements, continues to struggle to meet children's emergency placement needs. Mancuso said multiple placements are "devastating" to a child already coping with considerable trauma.

After studying emergency placements in DCF's Hartford and Meriden offices, Mancuso said he found there are "placement crises on a regular and recurrent basis that adversely affect the well-being of children in the department's care."

Both DCF and Carr declined to discuss the details of Leah's case or whether she has been returned to her parents' care.

View My Stats