Elin, Debby, Freedom, Justice, and the USA
Deb Lafave, now known as Debra Beasley, photo stolen [from here]
More photos and video:
above photo stolen [from here]
Text of narration posted as a video on liveleak.com:
Tiger Woods' wife, Elin Nordegren, used a golf club to smash the hell out a SUV and probably her husband. An average man doing this in the US would go directly to jail, his significant other would not have to even press charges. The man would not be able to see much of his kids, if at all, would lose all property, and the wife would get everything in the divorce as he rotted in jail serving time for felony assault.
Deb Lafave, now going by Debra Beasley, was a teacher who likes to seduce and have sex with underage boys. Police had her strip naked to take evidence photos with their cell phones and digital cameras. A judge didn't find it necessary to put this pedophile in prison even though she keeps offending and won't learn her lesson. Let's now replace her with an average guy doing the same thing to underage girls. What would happen to him?
What is my point? I'm using simple examples to show the legal system in the US is just a sham, a show, it's rigged.
Judge Jonathan J. Kaplan, of Rockville Superior Court GA #19 in Connecticut, as Administrative Judge overseeing Judge Swords, didn't see any harm in a man who admitted raping a 3 year old in not getting prison time and not having to register as a sex offender.
Martha Coakley as the official in charge, did all she could to prevent justice in the case where Massachusetts Police Officer Keith Winfield raped a 2 year old with a hot curling iron. The child was in the hospital for over a month.
If a citizen has a gripe against the police, the courts, or government, he or she has to sue in courts. A judge can receive a motion from the perpetrators of official crimes asking for “Summary Judgment for the Defendant”, which is asking the judge to throw the case out. This now happens almost 100% of time in these types of cases. There is no justice system in the US, no honest investigations, and the US is the new Soviet Union.
I tried to have Judge Jonathan J. Kaplan removed as judge for bad behavior in civil cases. I resisted being mugged on my property. Judge Kaplan was okay with a violent felon who attacked me, threatening to cut my penis off if I didn't turn over my wallet, but was not okay with me resisting and fighting back. I got a year in prison for “overreacting to being mugged”, by fighting the guy off, and using pepper spray not to get stabbed. I received a year in prison, 3 years probation, largest fines, and harshest conditions of release. I suffered far worse than armed robbers, rapists, and scum of the earth criminals.
I go to a public hearing in Connecticut tomorrow to ask that Judge Jonathan J. Kaplan not be reappointed judge in Connecticut. I feel I'm risking my skin just going. So, if you don't hear from me again, it is death or prison for daring to complain in the USA.
-Steven G. Erickson
Rockville Connecticut Superior Court Sex Offender Scandal:
* * * *
The below found:
South Carolina forces “subversives” to register with the authorities or do hard time
Paul Joseph Watson
Monday, February 8, 2010
Subversives who think government is corrupt and should be controlled by the people face 10 years in prison and a $25,000 dollar fine if they fail to register with authorities in South Carolina, in another chilling example of how free speech and dissent is being criminalized in America.
The state’s “Subversive Activities Registration Act” is now officially on the books and mandates that “Every member of a subversive organization, or an organization subject to foreign control, every foreign agent and every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States … shall register with the Secretary of State.”
Of course, the right to overthrow a government that has become corrupt, abusive and completely unrepresentative of its electorate is enshrined in the Declaration of Independence – that’s how America came to be a Republic in the first place – advocating or teaching that the people should “control” the government via their elected representatives is a basic function of a democratic society, but this law effectively makes it a terrorist offense.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness,” states the Declaration of Independence.
Under the sweeping terms of the law, members of tax protest organizations, the Tea Party movement and the States’ Rights movement based in South Carolina are all domestic terrorists if they fail to register their dissent with the authorities.
It is important to stress that the notion this law somehow only applies to “Islamic terrorists” is completely at odds with the fact that federal and state authorities now consider the main terror threat to be from informed American citizens exercising their constitutional rights in opposition to the big government agenda they are being subjected to.
As we saw with the MIAC report and a plethora of similar training manuals which were leaked over the last decade, police are being trained that libertarians, gun owners, Ron Paul supporters and anyone who is mildly political is a domestic extremist and a potential terrorist – these people are the real target of the subversives list in South Carolina.
The infamous Phoenix Federal Bureau of Investigation manual (page one, page two) produced in association with the Joint Terrorism Task Force listed “defenders of the U.S. constitution” and “lone individuals” as terrorists. Will anyone in South Carolina who defends the Constitution, the very bedrock of what America stands for, have to register with the authorities unless they want to be locked up for a decade?
Of course, since nobody is going to register as a “subversive” with South Carolina authorities, their failure to “comply” with the regulation will later be used against them as a means of eliciting criminal charges, in what represents a clear end run around the First Amendment.
The government isn’t going to just come out all guns blazing and ban free speech, they are simply going to make anyone who refuses to register for permission a criminal for failing to adhere to a separate mandate.
Just like people in places such as New York and Chicago were told that they had to get a license to purchase a gun – at first the process was a mere inconvenience but now the licensing process means they have to jump through 200 flaming hoops and the second amendment has effectively been outlawed in these cities.
They won’t hesitate to pull the same tricks with the First Amendment, and it’s already happening with calls to license Internet users and force them to get government permission to run a website.
* * * *
* * * *
Why not check out alternative news sources, videos, and views? [post]
* * * *
Will Free Speech have to move off shore and out of the US. Is Google funded and run by the NSA? Will google blogs like this one start to disappear and be blocked. Will I have to register as a subversive for exposing this to you? Will I go to prison for wanting to remove Judge Jonathan J. Kaplan? Maybe Alex Jones won't be able to post blogs and videos in the US. If not there is still liveleak.com or other video uploader sites and blog site providers. The UK is likely to go the way of the US.
The below found:
Internet Censorship Alert! Alex Jones exposes agenda to ‘blacklist’ dissenting sites and license users
Aaron Dykes & Alex Jones
February 9, 2010
The Western world, from Australia to the United States, UK and parts of Europe, are moving in a unified front toward dictatorial Internet censorship. Australia has led the way, despite outcry from its populace, by “filtering” out certain banned content. In the United States, Sen. Jay Rockefeller, in continuing his family’s tradition of oppressing free humanity, has pushed forward Cybersecurity legislation that has already passed the House. He has done so in the name of warding off ghastly cyber “attackers” conceivably fronting for al Qaeda while ushering in a means to restrict free speech and expression online for the general population.With Obama’s support, most of the developed world has accepted plans for government-approved online activity and Pentagon-monitored internet traffic. The U.S. and UK are facilitating the hijacking of what has, until now, been a highly-democratic Internet. Overall, it has been a technological God-send for bringing together communication and strongly expressing thought outside of the mainstream information available on television and in print.
Now, people are being forced onto the corporate-dominated Internet2– once again, in the name of “security.” (Internet) Freedom sacrificed at the same false alter of (Internet) Security. Independent blogs, news sites and online businesses will all be financially disadvantaged by access fees not demanded of dominant entities. What is today outside the ‘norm’ but well within free speech will tomorrow be evaluated by politically-correct criteria that will be used to identify sites to block and users to deny access. Currently, a campaign is underway to convince the public to accept “driver’s licenses” for the once-free Internet.
Already, government “blacklists” have been exposed. On its lists? The usual suspects– Infowars.com, PrisonPlanet.com, Wikileaks.org and the like. Referrals to sites like Infowars.com and PrisonPlanet.com are being denied not only in Australia, but in places like New Zealand– who have not adopted the same policies, but do share ISPs who have ordered a block. All across the world, wherever internet “filtering” and outright censorship has been phased in– via libraries, businesses, airports, and so forth, sites that are critical of government are consistently blocked first. This has been true not only of Alex Jones’ several websites, but also of sites like Wikileaks, Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Cryptome and etc, etc. The common theme is not operating outside of law or of speaking in extremities, but challenging the power establishment through distribution of information and/or shedding light on its otherwise little known unscrupulous activities.
This Orwellian scheme has already been branded by the outrages of Cass Sunstein, one of the Obama ‘Czars’, who has called for governments to ban “conspiratorial theories” and identified thought-crimes including a disbelief in man-made global warming and a belief in the basic goodness of “sunshine.” In considering how to eradicate ‘outlawed’ beliefs, Sunstein posits the benefits of using bloggers to engage and counter ‘disinformation.’ A very similar version of this strategy has already been adopted by the Pentagon in its “infowars” campaign.
Alex uses his most-recent experience in an outright ban to sound a warning that the enemy is already among us. Internet censorship threatens to stifle out a recent phenomenon of free thought and widespread information that has flourished on the Internet / world wide web. Only by standing up to undue constraints on our rights and by saying no to efforts to chill speech on the web can we save a stronghold of free humanity.
* * * *
* * * *
[click here] for: