Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Attack On Sovereignty





The image and the below re-posted from here.

Cross-posted from Paul Craig Roberts

Those concerned about "The New World Order" speak as if the United States is coming under the control of an outside conspiratorial force. In fact, it is the US that is the New World Order. That is what the American unipolar world, about which China, Russia, and Iran complain, is all about.


Washington has demonstrated that it has no respect for its own laws and Constitution, much less any respect for international law and the law and sovereignty of other countries. All that counts is Washington's will as the pursuit of hegemony moves Washington closer to becoming a world dictator.

The examples are so numerous someone should compile them into a book. During the Reagan administration the long established bank secrecy laws of Switzerland had to bend to Washington's will. The Clinton administration attacked Serbia, murdered civilians and sent Serbia's president to be tried as a war criminal for defending his country. The US government engages in widespread spying on Europeans' emails and telephone calls that is unrelated to terrorism. Julian Assange is confined to the Ecuadoran embassy in London, because Washington won't permit the British government to honor his grant of political asylum. Washington refuses to comply with a writ of habeas corpus from a British count to turn over Yunus Rahmatullah whose detention a British Court of Appeals has ruled to be unlawful. Washington imposes sanctions on other countries and enforces them by cutting sovereign nations that do not comply out of the international payments system.

Last week the Obama regime warned the British government that it was a violation of US interests for the UK to pull out of the European Union or reduce its ties to the EU in any way.

In other words, the sovereignty of Great Britain is not a choice to be made by the British government or people. The decision is made by Washington in keeping with Washington's interest.

The British are so accustomed to being Washington's colony that deputy prime minister Nick Clegg and a group of UK business executives quickly lined up with Washington.

This leaves Great Britain in a quandary. The British economy, once a manufacturing powerhouse, has been reduced to the City of London, Britain's equivalent to Wall Street. London, like New York, is a world financial center of which there are none in Europe. Without its financial status, there wouldn't be much left of the UK.

It is because of the City's financial importance that the UK, alone of the EU member states, kept the British pound as its currency and did not join the euro. Because the UK has its own currency and central bank, the UK was spared the sovereign debt crisis that has plagued other EU member states. The Bank of England, like the Federal Reserve in the US, was able to bail out its own banks, whereas other EU states sharing a common currency could not create money, and the European Central Bank is prohibited by its charter (at Germany's insistence) from bailing out member states.

The quandary for the UK is that the solution to the sovereign debt crisis toward which the EU is moving is to strip the member governments of their fiscal sovereignty. For the individual countries, the spending, taxing and, thereby, deficit or surplus positions of the member countries' budgets will be set by EU central authority. This would mean the end of national sovereignty for European countries.

For Britain to remain an EU member while retaining its own currency and central bank would mean special status for Great Britain. The UK would be the only member of the EU that remained a sovereign country. What are the chances that the UK will be permitted such exceptional status? Is this acceptable to Germany and France?

If the British are to fold themselves into Europe, they will have to give up their currency, central bank, their law, and their economic status as a world financial center and accept governance by the EU bureaucracy. The British will have to give up being somebody and become nobody.

It would, however, free the UK from being Washington's puppet unless the EU itself is Washington's puppet.
According to reports, sometime this year Scotland, a constituent part of the UK, is to vote on leaving the UK and becoming an independent country. How ironic that as the UK debates its dismemberment, the country itself faces being merged into a multi-national state.

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/
Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal, has held numerous university appointments and is Contributing Editor to Gerald Celente's Trends Journal. His columns are at (more...)
* * * *
* * * *

Steven G. Erickson's opinion: If Obama uses Executive Signing Orders to do anything that is against the US Constitution he should be arrested and prosecuted. I believe the Connecticut State Police brass have conspired against the American People. 


Sandy Hook, A Police Informant, real shooter?


Text with video:

The name Chris Rodia, an alleged Norwalk or Stamford Connecticut Police Informant? Were there actors hired to hold the story together? Was Rodia's car the one that Adam Lanza allegedly used? Was Chris Rodia at the Sandy Hook Newtown Connecticut Schoolyard shooting? If so, what was his role. An hour and a half video asks those questions. [the video]

Is it a hoax? [Links]

Are police informants involved in beating up police officers who break ranks and for killing civilians? [post]

Is this how judges are corrupted? [post] This is how you "get made" in the Connecticut State Police Mafia. [post] My letter to Connecticut Governor Malloy [post]

I, Steven G. Erickson, was blocked from posting and commenting on Opednews.com, allegedly for questioning the Connecticut State Police version of the Sandy Hook story. Should anyone, anywhere in the world be arrested for questioning the Connecticut State Police Story? Spokesman Paul Vance seems to threaten just that. Should you be blocked from the internet for being Pro-2nd Amendment or US Constitution?

SANDY HOOK HOAX BLOWN TO PIECES - THE ACTORS, PUPPETS AND MOTIVES - GUN CONTROL AGENDA SCAM


Text with video:

Published on Jan 13, 2013
https://picasaweb.google.com/108353779637663365536/ALBUM001#5684115058604686450 "Carlos Matthew Soto" younger (2007) and the "Phelps" (Sexton).
Parker's Photoshop: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qe9KehTf82o THEY ARE ACTORS. SHARE - LIKE - FAVORITE - TWEET - FB - RE-UPLOAD - READ DESCRIPTION - DOWNLOAD - COPY-PASTE TITLE/URL - SPREAD THE WORD - MAKE THIS VIRAL - I'M COUNTING ON YOU!

Copy-paste the following if you want and spread it like a virus in related/popular videos/articles/etc:

"SANDY HOOK WAS A HOAX:

YouTube: "SANDY HOOK HOAX BLOWN TO PIECES - THE ACTORS, PUPPETS AND MOTIVES - GUN CONTROL AGENDA SCAM" OR /watch?v=R3DR6zTVVFY"

GREENBERG PHOTO ALBUM (This is a re-upload of the albums): https://picasaweb.google.com/108353779637663365536

RAW First Aerial View Sandy Hook: http://www.wfsb.com/video?clipId=8069373&%C2%ADautostart=true%EF%BB%BF

"Parker" family with Barry: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2249148/Sandy-Hook-school-shooting-Pr...

Batman TDKR connection (1hr 58mins): http://illuminutti.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/thedarkknight12.jpg


Special thanks for the uploads and exposing the TRUTH to the following channels:

Scott Walker http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCH7lietNjn7CJoHE-qUQEeQ
thepaulstalservice http://www.youtube.com/user/thepaulstalservice
Life in a Psyop http://www.youtube.com/user/lifepsyop
Operation Terror http://www.youtube.com/user/OperationTerror
We Are Change http://www.youtube.com/user/wearechange
revmichellehopkins http://www.youtube.com/user/revmichellehopkins
Sheilaaliens 2 http://www.youtube.com/user/Sheilaalien
m m http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBxTOEpGLpxHnG-GFAiVUcQ
LogicBeforeAuthority http://www.youtube.com/user/LogicBeforeAuthority
HistoricalRecordsVLT http://www.youtube.com/user/HistoricalRecordsVLT
1mYourGh0st http://www.youtube.com/user/1mYourGh0st
I would also like to thank my supporters, all truth seekers, and subscribers!

Other mentions:
CNN http://www.youtube.com/user/CNN
The White House http://www.youtube.com/user/whitehouse
ABC News http://www.youtube.com/user/ABCNews

PETITIONS YOU SHOULD SIGN:

1. http://wh.gov/nMVX
2. http://wh.gov/nFYI
3. http://wh.gov/Q7UM
4. http://wh.gov/QMCs
5. http://wh.gov/QsPJ
6. http://wh.gov/QXw6
7. http://wh.gov/Q9aV
8. http://wh.gov/Qze5
9. http://wh.gov/Q7zv
10. http://wh.gov/PzTJ

THE GUN DEBATE:

Both Sides of The Argument:
YouTube: "GOA Larry Pratt Owns CNN's Piers Morgan On 2nd Amendment And Gun Control" OR http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHJcSsC0aY

The History of Gun Control:
YouTube: "INNOCENTS BETRAYED - The TRUE story of GUN CONTROL WORLDWIDE - (Graphic Images)" OR http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pKasF6l3y0

Australia Gun Ban:
YouTube: "Watch what happens when Guns are banned in Australia" OR http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8RDWltHxRc

Contact your representatives.

RECOMMENDED CHANNELS (SUBSCRIBE):
http://www.youtube.com/user/scrawny2brawny
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheGroxt
http://www.youtube.com/user/BenSwannRealityCheck
http://www.youtube.com/user/wearechange
https://www.youtube.com/user/AmidsTheNoise
http://www.youtube.com/user/revmichellehopkins
http://www.youtube.com/user/LogicBeforeAuthority
http://www.youtube.com/user/LifePsyop
http://www.youtube.com/user/thepaulstalservice
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCH7lietNjn7CJoHE-qUQEeQ
http://www.youtube.com/user/AlienScientist
http://www.youtube.com/user/Suspicious0bservers
http://www.youtube.com/user/GrayStateMovie
http://www.youtube.com/user/matlarson10
http://www.youtube.com/user/weavingspider
http://www.youtube.com/user/galacticwacko
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheSpiritScience
http://www.youtube.com/user/ae911truth
http://www.youtube.com/user/R11110000
http://www.youtube.com/user/sv3rige
http://www.youtube.com/user/RedPillR3volution

§ 107 . Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—

(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;

(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;

(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and

(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


View My Stats