Saturday, July 20, 2013

Taxpayers paying for Official Sexual Predator Surveillance?

The corporate dairy lobby may have succeeded in adding aspartame to milk with no labeling. The FDA may have paved the way. Aspartame is poison, can cause headaches, seizures, nerve damage, other medical problems and even death. Who is protecting us from these corporate predators if these same officials transition back and forth from these corporations and take corporate money for their campaigns?

Monsanto tainted food is GMO poison. Will other countries ban American grown poison GMO crops, so mainly Americans and those who are in 3rd World countries will have to eat this "food", unlabeled? Most US states are not willing not to do Monsanto's bidding as Monsanto has lots of lawyers and deep pockets. State operators do not want to go bankrupt in the corporation rigged and funded courts.

Does it cost $50,000 a year to spy on a citizen and keep records of the surveillance? Well, if everyone is being spied on all the time, what is the real cost of this? Should public transportation and college educations be funded with all this money being misappropriated by these official criminal domestic spying perverts?

If these CIA, IRS, NSA, FBI, police, and international corporate spies are collecting naked pictures of little boys and little girls, should their child porn be protected under their government immunity from prosecution? Should taxpayers be funding their own abuse?

[I was asked to help police ruin the self-employed pre-9/11]. I had built a contracting business over 2 decades and had fixed up rental properties from a boarded up condition. So, taxpayer dollars are used to terrorize people like me, break up our families, make us lose our homes and then railroad us to prison. How does taking productive people offline and unable to pay taxes, to then cost taxpayers more in taxes, make economic sense? The answer is that it does not. The elite want to run us off the land, take over all business, and to control all cash and assets. We are all going to be chipped and are currently under 100% surveillance all the time. Is this for our protection, or their protection?

I think you know the answer.

* * * *

I let the Governor of Connecticut, Dannel P. Malloy, know about this:

Of course, I have heard nothing back.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

View My Stats