Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Pentagon's Theft of 8.5 Trillion, a Complete Scam, Explained

When there is a hand in the cookie jar stealing all the cookies whenever there are cookies in the cookie jar, the hand needs to be cut off.




If a baseball player uses steroids there can be a Congressional Special Hearing. Steal more that the gross national product and nothing ... that is okay because those who regulate the scammers are the scammers.

[Steven G. Erickson's video upload and favorites channel]

If we are paying taxes to foreign banks and/or corporate entities, aren't we a colony of those UK based banks? Was America ever an independent nation, or has it just been a front for generations of scammers who only played that America was an independent nation?

stevengerickson AT yahoo.com



Against Fascism: Towards the Separation of Business and State


Text and Transcripts to go with video:

by [James Corbett]
BoilingFrogsPost.com
February 11, 2014
Since 1996, the United States Department of Defense has accumulated an $8.5 trillion black hole in its budget. The number is so staggering that it is quite literally inconceivable. Several times larger than the annual budget for the entire federal government, it is equivalent to half of the entire fraudulent debt of the United States government itself. Aside from a recent report by Reuters or the occasional back-of-the-paper mention in one of the dinosaur media outlets, however, you’d have to turn to Russian state-sponsored media to discover this fact.

An alien visiting earth from another planet could be forgiven for legitimately questioning why this scandal is virtually unknown while the details of Justin Bieber’s latest arrest or Miley Cyrus’ latest antics are literally unavoidable in the cultural zeitgeist. Or why the use of steroids in Major League Baseball is considered worthy of earnest Congressional investigation while this unaccounted for $8.5 trillion is relegated to passing mention in the occasional Congressional hearing.

What seems perplexing from an outside perspective, however, is mundane reality to those inside the system. The truth is that despite all the fuzzy rhetoric about republics and inalienable rights and the rule of law, the United States is nothing but an oligarchy, run by a handful of international banking syndicates, their multinational corporate cronies, and the politicians in their back pocket. The Pentagon budget story is not reported on for the simple reason that it is the defense contractors that own much of the media, and have intimate relations with those outlets that are not directly under their control.

And the defense contractors, in turn, own the political figures that decide who receive the government’s defense contracts. The classic example of this is Dick Cheney. As George H.W. Bush’s Secretary of Defense, he awarded a contract to KBR, a Halliburton subsidiary, to investigate the possibility of contracting out military services to private companies. Unsurprisingly, KBR concluded this would be a good thing, and soon Halliburton and other private companies were receiving a larger and larger slice of the Washington defense budget pie. Also unsurprisingly, Cheney left his post as Defense Secretary at the end of the Bush Administration and became CEO of Halliburton.

But this is not the only example of the defense contractor revolving door. As Ryan Dawson of The ANC Report notes in his new e-book, The Separation of Business and State:

“Thomas White, the Secretary of the Army, was involved with Enron as a senior executive. He unloaded 200,000 shares (12 million dollars’ worth) of their stock during that scandal. While White was serving as the Vice Chairman of Enron Energy Services, he actively used his political contacts to give Enron a single bidder contract to privatize the power supply for Fort Hamilton. He was also fond of using military jets for personal trips for himself and his wife.”

And:
“Gordon England, the Secretary of the Navy, flipped back and forth between General Dynamics and Lockheed Martin. Lockheed Martin is at the top of the list when it comes to Pentagon contracts and General Dynamics is usually in the top five. England was the President of General Dynamics’ Land Systems Division and later became President for General Dynamics’ entire Fort Worth Division. That Division was sold to Lockheed and he became a President there.”

Sadly, the list of such blatant conflicts of interest is nearly endless and by no means limited to the military-industrial complex. The same is true of the revolving door in the biotech industry around companies like Monsanto and in the healthcare sector, where high-ranking insurance company executives literally write the legislation that mandates everyone to purchase health insurance from the corporations.

The problem is so blatant, so obvious, so out in the open that even its opponents readily admit to its existence. And yet it continues without significant opposition from the public. How can this happen? Because—in a twist that again would be difficult to explain to anyone not steeped in this system

—people disagree not on the problem itself, but on what to call it.

This is the ultimate example of divide and conquer in action. A small, readily-identifiable ruling oligarchy that no serious political observer denies the existence of is able to keep the public from attacking it by dividing them along ideological grounds so that the public spends all their time arguing over definitions and splitting doctrinal hairs instead of attacking the commonly acknowledged enemy.

You couldn’t ask for a more perfect system of control.

Thankfully, the corollary of this divide and conquer strategy is that it is possible to unite the people against their common enemy simply by employing some rhetorical strategies of their own.

As we shall see next week, the idea of uniting the public against the oligarchs is not only possible, it is actually happening in case after case. But as always it is a question of whether it is enough to push back against this oligarchical control, or if it is too little, too late.

-

New Precedent, Obama can kill US Citizens just on his say so

Obama does not need to offer any proof that a US citizen is a terrorist, he can just claim he, or she is, and drone bombing or military strike can be launched on the targeted individual ... I guess I allegedly should not have posted a [video of Obama's porn mother showing her stuff] with over 21,000 views or allegedly [a video of a deuce being dropped on O'Dramas picture and then setting it on fire].

How much secret killing, torture, and indefinite detention is Obama, the CIA, the NSA, and other affiliates really responsible for?

Is Obama for foreign corporations and international bankers or is he for average Americans and honoring and protecting the US Constitution?

Text with below video:

Published on Feb 11, 2014

The U.S. government is once again considering whether or not to use a drone strike to assassinate a u.s. citizen living overseas who is suspected of terrorism. Watch the video to see why Ben says despite the appearance of a NEW drone strike policy... nothing has actually changed.



Obama Admin. Trying To Decide Whether To Assassinate Another U.S. Citizen Overseas



-

If cities like Detroit can be sold in pieces to Canada, or other countries, can't they then ban guns if a foreign country owns US cities after they go bankrupt? They are poorly run, and run into the ground. So, are we going to be taken over, by being bought out?



Billionaire, and former New York City Mayor, Michael Bloomberg has aligned with mayors of many cities to illegally ban and confiscate American guns. Should officials, and former officials who are trying to dismantle the US Constitution to benefit foreign banks and international corporations be arrested and prosecuted? [My links]

Why are Americans renouncing their citizenship in record numbers?


BOMBSHELL: Gov. Asks Mayors to Confiscate Guns


Text with video:

Published on Feb 10, 2014
Alex covers headlines in the news including a california school removing food from the menu because it's racially insensitivity, black residents refusing the opening of a store that will "Bring white people to the area" and the news that Iran is planning attacks on the US. as well as the bombshell release of the fact that the Government has asked city mayors to sign on to confiscate guns.
http://www.infowars.com/nearly-50-of-...
http://www.infowars.com/bloomberg-cau...
http://www.infowars.com/mayor-nationw...




Drafting Legislation to Ban ALL GUNS IN US

Protecting children is of the utmost responsibility of all. No actions taken are going too far. So, banning anything that can be dangerous to children should be enacted and enforced.

But, also keep in mind police in the US have no obligation to answer calls, including 911 calls in a timely manner, or at all. There #1 priority is protecting the integrity of the system. If the system is actually to benefit international bankers and corporate interests, their interests are your interests, right? So to best serve them, this includes getting rid of small business owners, the self-employed, gun owners, and the outspoken about judicial misconduct, police brutality, and public corruption because these institutions best serve the corporate state.

Justice is just a word, not an expectation. Freedom isn't free.

[My message to elected officials]

Citizen satirizes proposed local firearms ordinances


Text with video:

Published on Feb 7, 2014
2014-02-04
Ashland Oregon

A citizen speaks to the City Council in opposition to a local "loaded carry" ban ordinance one of the Councilors has brought for consideration. No facts, figures, statistics, or other evidence of any existing problem has been presented by the sponsoring Councilor. She has however, made emotional pleas to "protect the children", dropped the "Sandy Hook" tragedy as supporting gun regulation, and other such bullshit.

She actually said "I know there are statistics out there but I didn't look them up". WTF

Meanwhile, the Chief of Police has stated that the town has NEVER had an incident involving an open carrier. Hmmmmm no problem? Why an ordinance then? Oh yeah....to FEEL good.

This citizen uses satire to point out the idiocy of the proposed ordinance.


MORE INFORMATION
about the speaker and the organization "Citizens for a REALLY Safe Ashland" can be found at the following links:

www.citizensforareallysafeashland.org

www.libertyashland.org

www.vigofox.com"


COPYRIGHT INFORMATION:
My copyright notice is ONLY for my editing work to clip, sync, etc. the video and audio.
This video (including editing of camera angles) was shot by Rogue Valley Television (RVTV), a partnership of public entities in Southern Oregon.




American Leaders JOKE About Dead Veterans and Children

What the real leaders are, past and present, is exposed in this video. Get a glimpse. It isn't pretty. It is reality.



Text with video:

Published on Feb 4, 2014
American political leaders of both parties are war mongering psychopaths. They do not care about you, your family, or the lives of innocent people. Watch as they laugh and make jokes about suffering and death.

http://www.john-friend.net/

http://tomatobubble.com/

http://americanfreepress.net/




Understanding International Banker Occupation from the 1600's

Very poor English speakers like Henry Kissinger with Nixon, and [Zbigniew Brzezinski] under Jimmy Carter. The almost non-English speakers seemed like they were really in charge of our money, wars, and policy. The puppeteer behind Obama isn't so easily identified.

The 7 embedded videos aren't new that I watched, I found it as one video and embedded that one. I could not find them here on LiveLeak. I just watched all 7 videos, back to back. They were loaded on youtube when only 10 minutes and smaller file sizes would be accepted. I haven't found a simpler explanation of what occurred in the past and what is happening now. The videos were actually shot not long after the Bill Clinton and George H. W. Bush contest.

Is the CIA a branch of UK banks? Is the US still a colony of the UK banks? How did the scam start? What are the names of individuals involved?

Do your own research. Look up the names. Do word searches. Are rightful owners of land and their labor being swindled by international criminals who print actually worthless paper? Why are we paying interest on money we did not agree to borrow? Would you like to understand all the warring and bait and switch still going on? Does the Federal Reserve System ensure that we will remain a colony of UK elite bankers?

Who are the Rothchilds ... really? Should these criminal families who have wrecked and abused humanity for centuries be rounded up and punished?




Text with video:

Uploaded on Jan 10, 2011
Eustace Mullins (1923-2010), America's foremost bank examiner, appears for the first time in a full studio production interview with "The Mouth of the South," Bobby Lee. Mullins, a renowned author, lecturer and scholar reveals over 50 years of intensive research in an incredible true story and documentation of the conspiracy against the patriotic, hard working families of middle America.

Playlist: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list...

MP3 Archives:
http://www.archive.org/details/Eustac...

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


View My Stats